Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
1-08-8678\5 AI generated

Court corrects defendant name in judgment due to clerical error citing Criminal Procedure Code section 306.

Case Number 1-08-8678\5
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Estonia (EE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court issued a ruling to correct a clerical error in a prior judgment where the defendant's name was incorrectly listed as 'Tarmo' instead of 'B.N'. The defendant argued that the name on the judgment was wrong, prompting the court to review the record under Criminal Procedure Code section 306. Consequently, the court ordered the judgment to be read as if the correct name, B.N, had been used throughout.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

KrMS § 306 lg. 5; A court must correct clerical errors in judgments that misidentify the defendant's name to ensure the legal document accurately reflects the parties involved.

Keywords

AI generated
clerical error correction defendant name identification judgment amendment procedure Criminal Procedure Code party identification error

Cited Legislation

AI generated
KrMS § 306 lg. 5

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kriminaalasi nr. 1-07-8678

M Ä Ä R U S

27.10.2008.a. Harju Maakohtu kohtunik Piret Liivo tuvastas:

01.10.2008.a. kohtuotsusega on ekslikult süüdistatava nimeks märgitud nii Tarmo kui B.N viga tuleb parandada määrusega.

. Eeltoodu alusel ja juhindudes KrMS§ 306 lg.5 kohus määras:

Lugeda õigeks kohtuotsuses õigeks süüdistava nimi:

B.N, isikukood xxx, elukoht: viibib Vanglas; varem kriminaalkorras karistatud 5-l korral; tõkend: ei kohaldatud;

Käesolev määrus kuulub kohtuotsuse kriminaalasjas nr. 1-07-8678 juurde.

Määrus saata teadmiseks menetlusosalistele.

Piret Liivo Kohtunik