Court dismissed appeal against criminal conviction for theft, upholding original verdict based on sufficient evidence.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Court of Appeal dismissed the appellant's appeal against the first-instance criminal conviction for theft. The appellant argued that the evidence was insufficient to prove the identity of the perpetrator, but the court found the testimonies and circumstantial evidence reliable. Consequently, the original judgment was upheld, and the appellant's request for acquittal was rejected.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedCriminal Procedure Code; Criminal Code: The court held that an appeal against a criminal conviction is inadmissible if the first-instance judgment is final and the appeal does not raise new facts or evidence.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
!"#$%!&'"() *+%+ ,-, ". //'' .".01 /0/2,*-1$)31 0455555555555&/"555&"66"555! 0 7"//8/" ' 7"/.. './(( ! !"# $$ %&'( )
(*+$ , - *.-(*-).- - /"."/"/ /"(/ . ("'//"0 "" (/./""// 3""/0' "'"()."//"/$*!-!$%!! /
(0
#
# & - "//#""/"'""0)0/&"/.0"/)"/(33(/("'0// ..1).00/ 2+0/"-,&-%&---&--9! //'' ".