Court dismissed enforcement of foreign judgment due to lack of jurisdiction and procedural defects. Foreign court lacked jurisdiction; Estonian court found procedural flaws invalidating enforcement. Judgment dismissed due to jurisdictional and procedural defects. Foreign court lacked jurisdiction; Estonian court found procedural flaws invalidating enforcement. Judgment dismissed due to jurisdictional and procedural defects.
Estonia (EE)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Tartu Regional Court dismissed the enforcement application against a foreign judgment. The applicant argued the foreign court had jurisdiction, but the court found the foreign proceedings violated Estonian procedural rules and lacked proper jurisdiction. Consequently, the court ruled that the foreign judgment could not be enforced in Estonia.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 17 ust. 1 k.r.s.; Art. 17 ust. 2 k.r.s.: A foreign judgment may not be enforced in Estonia if the foreign court lacked jurisdiction or if the proceedings violated fundamental principles of Estonian law.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
!""#$#% & '( ))''
*' +' , ' - ' . " ''
- %% # # ///////// ////" /// ///// ////// ' ' ))' "
- - ' -' '0 + -- ( ' ' 1 ' ' '' ' 2 # 0 # 2 # 3' . ' - * - ' " 2
' ' '4' 5 !"
#$ % , - ' . ' ( ' ' 1 ' ' ' ' - ' -' & $ % ' % ' % ( ) ** '
' +* ', -**! ' ' ' ''- 6 ' . ' -' 0 ' ''-' ' -' ' ' ' % ' ' ' ' ' $' $ . '* ' %,* * ' ' - *
' . ' 0
*' +' , '
-' ( ' ' 1 ' ' ' ' '' - *
*
' 7 6 $' % ') $( ( ' ' 1 ' ' 2 # 0 # 2 # 3 ' ' ' . '' - 8 #! 0 * 0' '0
'4' 2
'
76 '' -' 0 - $%# *' ' *'0 ' - 0 ' ' ' - - " ' ' - ' ' '' ' ''-'' - ' ' '' ' )) 0
*' ' -' '0 , ' ' - - - -' , 8 # '0 "% * - ' 44- ' - ' ' - ' - ' '0 ' 4 '4' 4 * ' ' 0 ' 4 * , ' . ' ' *' - ' 0 - -' - ' ' )) - -- '0 "2
' '4' .
* -' *7 9 6 ' . - - ' ' ' -' '' & , '