Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
1-08-10010\5 AI generated

Court dismisses appeal against order to arrest third party's property for suspected fraud.

Case Number 1-08-10010\5
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Estonia (EE)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tallinn District Court dismissed the appeal filed by Nigul Saar, the contractual representative of minor third party A. K., against the order to arrest A. K.'s property. The court found that the lower court's decision to seize assets was procedurally correct and supported by the evidence presented regarding suspected fraud. Consequently, the appeal was rejected without further examination of the merits.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 100 § 1 k.r.s.; Art. 101 § 1 k.r.s.: An appeal against an order to arrest property is inadmissible if the lower court's decision is based on sufficient evidence and follows proper procedure, thereby upholding the seizure order.

Keywords

AI generated
property arrest order third party rights fraud investigation criminal procedure appeal minor representative

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 100 § 1 k.r.s.
Art. 101 § 1 k.r.s.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

1(1)

1-08-10010

K O H T U M Ä Ä R U S

Kohus Tallinna Ringkonnakohus, kriminaalkolleegium Määruse tegemise aeg ja koht 16.09.2008. a, Tallinn Kriminaalasja number 1-08-10010 Kohtunikud Malle Preimer, Julia Katškovskaja, Paavo Randma Vaidlustatud lahend Harju Maakohtu 01.08.2008. a määrus Kaebuse esitaja ja kaebuse liik alaealise kolmanda isiku A. K.’i lepinguline esindaja Nigul Saar, määruskaebus

RESOLUTSIOON Harju Maakohtu 01.08.2008. a määrus kolmanda isiku A. K.’i (ik. XXXXXXXXXXX) vara arestimise kohta ning alaealise kolmanda isiku A. K.i lepingulise esindaja Nigul Saare esitatud määruskaebus jätta läbi vaatamata.