Court dismissed enforcement of foreign judgment due to lack of jurisdiction and procedural defects under Estonian law.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Tartu Regional Court dismissed the enforcement application for a foreign judgment against the defendant. The plaintiff argued the judgment was final, while the defendant contested jurisdiction and procedural irregularities. The court ruled that Estonian courts lacked jurisdiction and the foreign proceedings violated local procedural requirements, leading to the dismissal.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 17 ust. 1 k.r.s.; Art. 17 ust. 2 k.r.s.: A foreign judgment cannot be enforced in Estonia if the Estonian court finds it lacks jurisdiction or if the foreign proceedings violated fundamental principles of Estonian law.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
!
" #$$%%# &
'( )&"" *& +&&,- ../.% ( -0 *& 1&( & , * )&"" *&( & ( , & (", &( ( &
*& & ,
)" & (&2 (3( & & ( "" ./ && ("( ( ( + ( " / / 0 )&"" *&( , &
&4&
. "& (", &( *
,
( 2&
( ,&( 44, (( *& &(
( 2( ( &'
2*(
( 2*(
& && & &,
(
( , & 2&,&
( , (& , ('( (
! " # !$
)" & (&2 (3( & 2& (& "" ./ && ("( ( ( + ( " / / 0 &
& )&"" *& 6 (
&
&4&
. "&
" )&"" *& (& ( & ,
*
", &
*& &(
* ( (& ( 2&(", , "&"
(& (
&(( &("(
((2*
( *& & (", & ( &
! . * ( ' ( & & (", &"( ( & (& ( &"& 2( & & & 44, "( " (""( (", ( & , & &
",
((' $ &
+0 &"" ( &( * ' *& & ,( & (", &(
( & ,
*& " ( %6
(& ",
( ( &( "* '
( 44, "( "
& . "&
*&( (
",
1 ( ,( ( 44, (( & ( , . "&
"
, (""( (", & ( , &
&&
(' *
*& & , ,