Court dismissed criminal appeal against conviction for theft, upholding the lower court's decision on facts and law.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the defendant's appeal against the first-instance conviction for theft. The defendant argued that the evidence was insufficient and the sentencing was too harsh, but the appellate court found the facts established beyond reasonable doubt. Consequently, the court upheld the original judgment, confirming the defendant's guilt and the imposed penalty.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedCriminal Code § 160; Criminal Procedure Code § 249: An appeal against a conviction for theft is dismissed when the appellate court finds that the lower court's assessment of facts and application of law were correct and the evidence sufficient.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
!"#$"
%%&"'"!(& "#$!")*
)+ ,
,),-.
/!,0 '1/+1 ',200 !1,
3((*0 ',
,,#"#.44((5%6
1"#$!788888888888888888888888888888861!,
+ ,,',#./,#
!"#$%#&
''
#()*)
)+
,
' -
.
/+.
)++0.
.
"
$!"!"1112,+1,!.1!,/,%5012*#" !",/'#//#$!"1 !"
#$!"#"."!1012!6),,2,),##$!"!"!2".#$!"!"1'6#",
1!,/,,'"1#"!),12,!/!1!!". !"#$!"1#, *,#"!012
*#"&$!"!"/#$!")1/1!"1!11!"!2"),1##$!"#/!11,#0!!1.2
!1(%&"'"!,!(&
$!"/,#