Court dismissed enforcement of a judgment against a foreign state for lack of jurisdiction and service issues.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the enforcement application against a foreign state due to procedural defects in service and lack of jurisdiction. The applicant failed to prove proper service of the original judgment on the state's representative, and the court found no basis to exercise jurisdiction over the foreign entity. Consequently, the enforcement proceedings were terminated as the legal prerequisites for enforcing a judgment against a foreign state were not met.
Legislator headnote
AI generateds. 10 of the Enforcement Act 1993; s. 1 of the Civil Procedure Code: A judgment against a foreign state cannot be enforced without proof of proper service and jurisdiction, and procedural defects in service render the enforcement application inadmissible.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
! "##"$$% & ' ( () * *** ++&
' )
, & - .++ ! " %" / # $ %& ' ()*+,-).*.- (+)) /
0"" 01 # -- . , & -- 0 1 2 .-/ '2$3'2#&#$ #%
12 '
, ( ) " 33& "4-, .-/ /, ,"4', -/, " , , &-- -, & . --& &-// , - " 4 ') , - & && , , '
, & & & -, " &
, & , '
&.-/" & & &/ &"
" -,&.-/
& & (
& . & **** &" & & %/ ++5/& / " 0 3 & ++ 0 ", " , ,& ,/ & , %6# & $/ & " -& . "4' --&- &&/ & , 0 & ..++" & - " /& -0 . / & - & & & / . & ++&70 ' )
, & - .++800& .& -0 & . --/ ,& , # /&-&/ .++&&. 3
/ //-0&/ " 4 ' , 33& -, && / -& .&& /0 & & -- -&/& / /- / & 4') - .&& ,3 //.++ - &- & . +/ .& &/ " / 3 / & -&/ -- / & " 0& & .&& & , ,&/ & & --& & 0 " ' )
, &/, - .++ - / 0 9 " &- &&--0 " -&/ : .++&& . 3
. /& -0& / / / " & . 3
/0 /&/0&. / / - & &" , &