Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
BS-29747/2025-OLR ECLI:DK:OLR:2025:BS0000001432 AI generated

Appeal against family court visitation order dismissed as no permit required under parental responsibility law.

Case Number BS-29747/2025-OLR
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Denmark (DK)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal dismissed the father's appeal regarding a visitation order established by the Family Court. The mother argued that a permit from the Process Permission Board was required to appeal under the Code of Civil Procedure, but the Court found this provision inapplicable because the Family Court had already decided on visitation under the Parental Responsibility Act. Consequently, the appeal was permitted without a permit, and the lower court's decision stands.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Retsplejelovens § 453, stk. 1, 2. pkt.; Forældreansvarslovens § 20a; When a Family Court decides on visitation under the Parental Responsibility Act, a permit from the Process Permission Board is not required to appeal the decision.

Keywords

AI generated
parental responsibility visitation order appeal procedure process permission family court appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Retsplejelovens § 453, stk. 1, 2. pkt.
retsplejelovens § 453, stk. 1, 2. pkt.
Forældreansvarslovens § 20a

Cited Case Law

AI generated
Vestre Landsrets kendelse af 4. februar 2025 (UfR 2025.1453)
AI generated
BS-33645/2020-OLR
Court dismisses appeal against district court refusal to refer case to first instance due to lack of general legal significance.
BS-2070/2010-VLR
Vestre Landsret overturned City Court's dismissal of a civil claim regarding property rights dispute.
BS-1438/2008-VLR
Vestre Landsret overturns City Court's dismissal and remands case for further proceedings on appeal.
BS-2638/2008-OLR
Court dismisses appeal against dismissal due to procedural time limit violation by defendant's counsel.
BS-3978/2024-OLR
Appeal dismissed for lack of legal basis to reject the appeal under the Rules of Civil Procedure.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Landsretten afviser ikke ankesagen i sag om § 20a i forældreansvarsloven

[DOKUMENT] Dom (3 sider) ØSTRE LANDSRET KENDELSE afsagt den 19. juni 2025

Sag BS-29747/2025-OLR (BerammelseFamilieret)

Far (advokat Preben Kønig)

mod

Mor (advokat Pernille Mary Marie Lauritsen)

Retten på Frederiksberg har den 13. maj 2025 afsagt dom i 1. instans (sag BS-17171/2025-FRB).

Landsdommerne Ib Hounsgaard Trabjerg, Kåre Mønsted og Jesper Schäfer Munk (kst.) har deltaget i sagens afgørelse.

Påstande Appellanten, Far, har anket dommen med påstand om, at der fastsættes samvær mellem Far og Barn i et af landsretten fastsat antal gange årligt, subsidiært at der mellem Far og Barn fastsættes anden form for kontakt end samvær som af landsretten bestemt, og mere subsidiært at familierettens dom ophæves, og sagen hjemvises til ny behandling i familieretten.

Indstævnte, Mor, har påstået ankesagen afvist med henvisning til, at der ikke foreligger en tilladelse til anke af dommen fra Procesbevillingsnævnet, jf. retsplejelovens § 453, stk. 1, 2. pkt.

Landsrettens begrundelse og resultat

Familieretten har ved dommen afgjort såvel spørgsmål om samvær som anden kontakt i medfør af forældreansvarslovens § 20 a, og bestemmelsen i retspleje-lovens § 453, stk. 1, 2. pkt., finder derfor ikke anvendelse. Dommen kan derfor, jf. herved tillige Vestre Landsrets kendelse af 4. februar 2025 gengivet i UfR 2025.1453, ankes uden Procesbevillingsnævnets tilladelse.

THI BESTEMMES:

Denne ankesag afvises ikke. Publiceret til portalen d. 20-06-2025 kl. 10:30 Modtagere: Appellant Far, Indstævnte Mor