Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
2 B 14/13, 2 B 14/13 (2 C 11/14) AI generated

Hypothetical causality in damages claims for unlawful non-promotion: accounting for budget place-of-service note dwell-time restrictions in bundle position allocation

Case Number 2 B 14/13, 2 B 14/13 (2 C 11/14)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) admitted the plaintiff's revision appeal to the higher court, finding the complaint against the lower court's refusal well-founded. The dispute concerns a damages claim for allegedly unlawful failure to promote a civil servant, specifically raising the question of how to assess hypothetical causality when the appointment of bundle positions is governed by provisions in the budget's place-of-service note that link to specific dwell times. The decisive legal basis for admitting the appeal is § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, as the issue was deemed to be of fundamental legal significance.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 71 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 13 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 40 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3 GKG; Hypothetical causality in damages claims for unlawful non-promotion: accounting for budget place-of-service note dwell-time restrictions in bundle position allocation: The dispute concerns a damages claim for allegedly unlawful failure to promote a civil servant, specifically raising the question of how to assess hypothetical causality when the appointment of bundle positions is governed by provisions in the budget's place-of-service note that link to specific dwell times. The decisive legal basis for admitting the appeal is § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, as the issue was deemed to be of fundamental legal significance.

Keywords

AI generated
provisions on promotion value in dispute accounting provision administrative complaint civil service procedural revision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for admitting the revision appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue regarding hypothetical causality in promotion damages claims.
§ 71 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Procedural basis for the determination of the value in dispute for the appeal proceedings.
§ 13 GKG
September 2002 - BVerwG 2 B 23.02 - Buchholz 360 § 13 GKG Nr.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Basis for the provisional determination of the value in dispute for the revision proceedings.
§ 40 GKG
Procedural basis for the determination of the value in dispute.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3 GKG
Procedural basis for the determination of the value in dispute.
§ 52 Abs. 5 Satz 2 i.V.m. Satz 1 Nr. 1 GKG a.F
Procedural basis for the determination of the value in dispute.
AI generated
2 B 15/13, 2 B 15/13 (2 C 12/14)
Hypothetical causality in damages claims for unlawful non-promotion and the consideration of budgetary position notes linking deployment to retention periods
2 B 13/13, 2 B 13/13 (2 C 10/14)
Damages for unlawful failure to promote: treatment of budgetary line-item notes in hypothetical causality
2 C 10/14
Damages for delayed police promotion: causality despite unlawful tenure-based selection restriction under Article 33(2) Basic Law and budgetary position limits
2 C 12/14
Damages for delayed civil servant promotion contingent on hypothetical promotion chance under budgetary constraints
2 BvR 811/09
Causality standard for secondary damages claims in civil service promotion disputes under Art. 33(2) GG

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for admitting the revision appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue regarding hypothetical causality in promotion damages claims.

§ 71 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Procedural basis for the determination of the value in dispute for the appeal proceedings.

§ 40 GKG

Procedural basis for the determination of the value in dispute.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3 GKG

Procedural basis for the determination of the value in dispute.

§ 52 Abs. 5 Satz 2 i.V.m. Satz 1 Nr. 1 GKG a.F.

Procedural basis for the determination of the value in dispute.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Basis for the provisional determination of the value in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Die zulässige Beschwerde des Klägers ist begründet. Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Frage geben, ob und ggf. wie bei einer Klage auf Schadensersatz wegen rechtswidrig unterlassener Beförderung im Rahmen der Ermittlung des hypothetischen Kausalverlaufs die - möglicherweise rechtswidrigen, weil an bestimmte Verweilzeiten anknüpfenden - Vorgaben eines Stellenvermerks des Haushaltsplans bei der Ausbringung gebündelter Stellen zu berücksichtigen sind.

Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 71 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG i.V.m. § 40, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 5 Satz 2 i.V.m. Satz 1 Nr. 1 GKG a.F. (Beschluss vom 26. September 2002 - BVerwG 2 B 23.02 - Buchholz 360 § 13 GKG Nr. 114 S. 10); die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung des Streitwerts für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.