Legislator Case Law & Legislation
5 B 56/13, 5 B 56/13 (5 C 7/14) AI generated

Reimbursement eligibility of private hospital expenses under public servant maintenance benefit: appropriateness requirement under § 5 BVO BW

Case Number 5 B 56/13, 5 B 56/13 (5 C 7/14)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court (5th Senate) admitted the defendant's appeal for review, granting a petition for leave to appeal on the grounds that the legal issue holds fundamental significance. The case concerns the eligibility of expenses incurred for stationary treatment in a private hospital for reimbursement under the public servants' maintenance benefit scheme in Baden-Württemberg. The defendant challenged the lower court's determination that such private hospital costs did not meet the requirement of appropriateness. The decisive legal basis is § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, which permits admission of the appeal when a question of fundamental importance—specifically the interpretation of "appropriateness" under § 5 Abs. 1 Satz 1 BVO BW regarding private hospital stays—requires clarification by the supreme administrative court. Consequently, the matter will proceed to the Federal Administrative Court for substantive adjudication.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Reimbursement eligibility of private hospital expenses under public servant maintenance benefit: appropriateness requirement under § 5 BVO BW: Die Beschwerde des Beklagten ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen.

Keywords

AI generated
hospital cost reimbursement public-law benefit administrative costs substantive requirements stay of proceedings deductibility of expenses

Cited Legislation

AI generated
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Beihilfefähigkeit von Leistungen von Privatkliniken; Revisionszulassung

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde des Beklagten ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen.

Die Revision kann dem Senat Gelegenheit geben, die Frage der Angemessenheit von Aufwendungen gemäß § 5 Abs. 1 Satz 1 BVO BW bei der stationären Unterbringung in einer Privatklinik zu klären.