Start of limitation period for lastenausgleich recovery triggered by knowledge via unauthorized authority
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted permission to appeal, allowing the plaintiff's complaint to proceed and establishing that the case holds fundamental legal significance. The dispute concerns a claim for the recovery of damages compensation under the Compensation Law, specifically challenging whether the deadline for such recovery begins to run when a compensation recipient becomes aware of the claim through a compensation authority that lacks jurisdiction. The central legal issue is the interpretation of the exclusion period for recovery under § 349 Abs. 5 Satz 4 of the Lastenausgleichsgesetz (LAG), focusing on the conditions under which knowledge by an unauthorized competent authority triggers the statute of limitations for the obligated party.
Legislator headnote
AI generated§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Start of limitation period for lastenausgleich recovery triggered by knowledge via unauthorized authority: The dispute concerns a claim for the recovery of damages compensation under the Compensation Law, specifically challenging whether the deadline for such recovery begins to run when a compensation recipient becomes aware of the claim through a compensation authority that lacks jurisdiction. The central legal issue is the interpretation of the exclusion period for recovery under § 349 Abs. 5 Satz 4 of the Lastenausgleichsgesetz (LAG), focusing on the conditions under which knowledge by an unauthorized competent authority triggers the statute of limitations for the obligated party.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedBasis for granting permission to appeal on grounds of fundamental legal significance.
Full text
Rückforderung bei Schadensausgleich; Kenntnis einer unzuständigen Lastenausgleichsbehörde; Ausschlussfrist; Revisionszulassung
[GRUENDE]
Die Beschwerde hat Erfolg. Der Rechtssache kommt die geltend gemachte grundsätzliche Bedeutung (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO) zu. Sie wird dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht voraussichtlich Gelegenheit geben, die Frage zu klären, ob und gegebenenfalls unter welchen Voraussetzungen die Kenntnis einer für die Rückforderung von Lastenausgleich unzuständigen Lastenausgleichsbehörde von dem Schadensausgleich und von der Person des Verpflichteten die Ausschlussfrist für die Rückforderung nach § 349 Abs. 5 Satz 4 des Lastenausgleichsgesetzes (LAG) in Gang setzt.