Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
8 B 45/13, 8 B 45/13 (8 C 3/14) AI generated

Eligibility of district chimney sweep master's application for alternative zone upon waiver of current appointment under Chimney Sweeps' Crafts Act

Case Number 8 B 45/13, 8 B 45/13 (8 C 3/14)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) permitted the plaintiff’s appeal to the higher court, granting the complaint and finding the matter to have fundamental significance. The dispute concerned administrative law, specifically whether a district chimney sweep master appointed to a specific sweeping district may have his application for a different district considered before his current appointment expires, provided he waives the current appointment, potentially under the suspensive condition of his appointment to the new district. The decisive legal issue identified for review is the interpretation of § 10(1) of the Chimney Sweeps' Crafts Act (Schornsteinfeger-Handwerksgesetz) in conjunction with § 5(1) of the Chimney Sweeps Act, § 11(5) of the Chimney Sweeps Act, and § 12(1) No. 1 of the Chimney Sweeps' Crafts Act.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Eligibility of district chimney sweep master's application for alternative zone upon waiver of current appointment under Chimney Sweeps' Crafts Act: The dispute concerned administrative law, specifically whether a district chimney sweep master appointed to a specific sweeping district may have his application for a different district considered before his current appointment expires, provided he waives the current appointment, potentially under the suspensive condition of his appointment to the new district. The decisive legal issue identified for review is the interpretation of § 10(1) of the Chimney Sweeps' Crafts Act (Schornsteinfeger-Handwerksgesetz) in conjunction with § 5(1) of the Chimney Sweeps Act, § 11(5) of the Chimney Sweeps Act, and § 12(1) No. 1 of the Chimney Sweeps' Crafts Act.

Keywords

AI generated
administrative complaint matter in dispute new application chimney-sweeping monopoly suspensive condition zoning regulations

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
The provision explicitly cited as the legal basis for admitting the revision due to the fundamental significance of the case.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Provisions cited to establish the legal basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
AI generated
8 B 5/17
Appointment of authorized district chimney sweep: review of discretionary selection criteria and judicial duty to investigate grading of professional qualifications
1 BvR 2918/09
Time-limited reappointment of district chimney sweep masters as objective professional access restriction justified by EU market access requirements
8 C 15/17
Mandatory individual registration of authorized district chimney sweeps in the craft register despite corporate entity registration
10 B 12/17
Transitional application of expired chimney sweep pension law to pre-2013 retirement claims
III ZR 315/09
State liability for chimney sweep's reliance on expired administrative directive for fire safety clearance standards

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

The provision explicitly cited as the legal basis for admitting the revision due to the fundamental significance of the case.

§ 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Provisions cited to establish the legal basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revisionszulassung; Berücksichtigung der Bewerbung eines Bezirksschornsteinfegermeisters um einen anderen Kehrbezirk vor Ablauf, aber bei Verzicht auf die bisherige Bestellung

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde hat Erfolg. Der Rechtssache kommt die vom Kläger geltend gemachte grundsätzliche Bedeutung zu (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO). Die Beschwerdebegründung führt auf die Frage, ob es nach § 10 Abs. 1 Schornsteinfeger-Handwerksgesetz (SchfHwG) - hier in entsprechender Anwendung gemäß § 5 Abs. 1 Schornsteinfegergesetz (SchfG) - ausgeschlossen ist, die Bewerbung eines für einen bestimmten Kehrbezirk bestellten Bezirksschornsteinfegermeisters um einen anderen Kehrbezirk vor Ablauf der bisherigen Bestellung zu berücksichtigen, wenn der Bewerber auf diese Bestellung - gegebenenfalls unter der aufschiebenden Bedingung seiner Bestellung für den anderen Kehrbezirk - verzichtet (vgl. § 11 Abs. 5 SchfG; § 12 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 SchfHwG).

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.