Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
2 B 74/12, 2 B 74/12 (2 C 50/13) AI generated

Admission of revision for disciplinary sanction assessment of extramural criminal conduct by police officer

Case Number 2 B 74/12, 2 B 74/12 (2 C 50/13)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) ordered the admission of the defendant's revision, thereby ruling in favor of the respondent by finding the case suitable for further appellate review; the lower court's judgment remains in force pending the substantive revision proceeding. The dispute concerns the calibration of disciplinary measures for a police officer who committed a criminal offense outside of official duties, with the specific challenge focusing on how such extramural misconduct is weighted within the disciplinary sanction catalog. The decisive legal basis is § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO and § 70 SächsDG, under which the court established that the case possesses fundamental significance for clarifying the legal assessment of the severity and relevance of a police officer's extracurial criminal behavior in disciplinary proceedings.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Admission of revision for disciplinary sanction assessment of extramural criminal conduct by police officer: Die Revision des Beklagten ist zuzulassen, weil die Rechtssache grundsätzliche Bedeutung im Sinne von § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 70 SächsDG hat. Das Revisionsverfahren erscheint geeignet, zur weiteren Klärung der Einordnung außerdienstlichen strafbaren Fehlverhaltens nach seiner Schwere in den Disziplinarmaßnahmekatalog beizutragen. Insbesondere kann geklärt werden, welche Bedeutung dem Umstand beizumessen ist, dass sich ein Polizeibeamter außerdienstlich strafbar gemacht hat.

Keywords

AI generated
criminal revision proceedings police misconduct disciplinary measures administrative sanction challenge of administrative decisions assessment of a fine

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Die Revision des Beklagten ist zuzulassen, weil die Rechtssache grundsätzliche Bedeutung im Sinne von § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 70 SächsDG hat.
AI generated
2 B 21/16
Police officer's removal for inner-service fraud: admissibility of revision based on unresolved disciplinary sentencing questions
2 B 39.25
Disciplinary dismissal of police officer for on-duty assault and evidentiary limits of criminal penalty order findings in civil service proceedings
2 B 25/24
Police officer's demotion for off-duty embezzlement: scope of discretionary mitigation and procedural admissibility of revision
2 C 38/10
Assessment of disciplinary measure for theft: aggregation of non-canonical mitigating circumstances to offset dismissal
2 B 6/19
Admissibility requirements for disciplinary revision and non-prejudicial effect of criminal sentencing on internal service offenses

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Maßnahmebemessung; außerdienstliches strafbares Fehlverhalten; Polizeibeamter; Revisionszulassung

[GRUENDE]

Die Revision des Beklagten ist zuzulassen, weil die Rechtssache grundsätzliche Bedeutung im Sinne von § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 70 SächsDG hat. Das Revisionsverfahren erscheint geeignet, zur weiteren Klärung der Einordnung außerdienstlichen strafbaren Fehlverhaltens nach seiner Schwere in den Disziplinarmaßnahmekatalog beizutragen. Insbesondere kann geklärt werden, welche Bedeutung dem Umstand beizumessen ist, dass sich ein Polizeibeamter außerdienstlich strafbar gemacht hat.