Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
6 B 20/13, 6 B 20/13 (6 C 39/13) AI generated

Transfer of licensed telecommunications public way rights to successor entity in statutory merger

Case Number 6 B 20/13, 6 B 20/13 (6 C 39/13)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court (6th Senate) granted the plaintiff's complaint against the non-admission of revision, declaring the appeal admissible on grounds of fundamental legal significance, thereby allowing the case to proceed to the full appellate court for a substantive ruling on whether telecommunications way rights granted via licensing transfer to a successor entity in a statutory merger. The dispute concerned the succession of public path usage rights established under the Telecommunications Act of 1996 during a corporate merger, challenging the lower court's refusal to review the specific legal question of right transferability in such reorganizations. The decision hinged on Section 132(2) No. 1 of the Code of Administrative Court Procedure (VwGO), which permits admission of revision when a case can clarify a general legal question not yet decided by the Federal Administrative Court, specifically regarding the interplay between licensing conditions under Sections 6, 8, and 50 of the Telecommunications Act and the continuity of administrative rights upon the dissolution and transfer of assets.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 und 3 GKG; Transfer of licensed telecommunications public way rights to successor entity in statutory merger: The dispute concerned the succession of public path usage rights established under the Telecommunications Act of 1996 during a corporate merger, challenging the lower court's refusal to review the specific legal question of right transferability in such reorganizations. The decision hinged on Section 132(2) No. 1 of the Code of Administrative Court Procedure (VwGO), which permits admission of revision when a case can clarify a general legal question not yet decided by the Federal Administrative Court, specifically regarding the interplay between licensing conditions under Sections 6, 8, and 50 of the Telecommunications Act and the continuity of administrative rights upon the dissolution and transfer of assets.

Keywords

AI generated
transfer of assets statutory right legal entity non-administrative dispute right of way merger of public corporations

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Ground for admitting the revision based on the fundamental legal significance of the dispute regarding the transfer of telecommunication way rights in a merger.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Basis for the determination of the amount in dispute for both the complaint and the revision procedure.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision procedure.
§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3 GKG
Basis for the determination of the amount in dispute for the complaint procedure.
AI generated
6 C 39/13
Telecommunications right of way lacks transferability via corporate merger under TKG 2004
6 B 71/23
Telecommunications network access: sufficiency of functional dominance over terminal lines and deferral of conflict resolution to the standard offer
6 B 40/15
Stand of third-party competitor in merger-related frequency sharing permit; lack of Rechtsschutzbedürfnis and drittschützende Wirkung of § 55 Abs. 8 TKG
6 B 30/20, 6 B 30/20 (6 C 13/20)
Admissibility of revision: legal basis for imposing spectrum-sharing and infrastructure negotiation obligations on licensees in frequency allocation procurement rules
6 B 53/12, 6 B 53/12 (6 C 10/13)
Dependency of final telecommunications fee authorization on prior consultation and consolidation proceedings

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Ground for admitting the revision based on the fundamental legal significance of the dispute regarding the transfer of telecommunication way rights in a merger.

§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3 GKG

Basis for the determination of the amount in dispute for the complaint procedure.

§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Basis for the determination of the amount in dispute for both the complaint and the revision procedure.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision procedure.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revisionszulassung; telekommunikationsrechtliches Wegerecht

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde der Klägerin gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision ist begründet. Die Rechtssache hat die geltend gemachte grundsätzliche Bedeutung (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO). Sie kann zur Klärung der Frage beitragen, ob ein Recht zur Benutzung öffentlicher Wege, das im Rahmen der Erteilung einer Lizenz nach § 6 Abs. 1 Nr. 1, Abs. 2 Nr. 1 Buchst. c, § 8 Abs. 1 bis 3, § 50 Abs. 2 Satz 1 des Telekommunikationsgesetzes vom 25. Juli 1996 (BGBl I S. 1120) übertragen worden ist, im Fall einer Verschmelzung auf den übernehmenden Rechtsträger übergeht.

Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.