Legislator Case Law & Legislation
5 B 27/13, 5 B 27/13 (5 C 37/13) AI generated

Reimbursement of Inpatient Private Clinic Expenses: Appropriateness Criteria Under Section 5 BVO BW

Case Number 5 B 27/13, 5 B 27/13 (5 C 37/13)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted the defendant’s appeal and reversed the lower court’s dismissal of the revision, ordering that the case be remanded for further proceedings on the merits. The dispute concerned the appropriateness of expenses incurred during inpatient treatment at a private clinic under social law, specifically challenging the reimbursement of costs. The decisive legal basis is Section 5, paragraph 1, sentence 1 of the Baden-Württemberg Social Code (BVO BW), with the court finding a fundamental legal question regarding the criteria for appropriate expenses in such institutions, thereby admitting the revision under Section 132, paragraph 2, number 1 of the Administrative Court Rules (VwGO).

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Reimbursement of Inpatient Private Clinic Expenses: Appropriateness Criteria Under Section 5 BVO BW: The dispute concerned the appropriateness of expenses incurred during inpatient treatment at a private clinic under social law, specifically challenging the reimbursement of costs. The decisive legal basis is Section 5, paragraph 1, sentence 1 of the Baden-Württemberg Social Code (BVO BW), with the court finding a fundamental legal question regarding the criteria for appropriate expenses in such institutions, thereby admitting the revision under Section 132, paragraph 2, number 1 of the Administrative Court Rules (VwGO).

Keywords

AI generated
reimbursement of costs care institution revision proceedings psychiatric inpatient clinic hospital billing administrative dismissal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Provision cited as the legal basis for admitting the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal question.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Die Beschwerde des Beklagten ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen.

Die Revision kann dem Senat Gelegenheit geben, die Frage der Angemessenheit von Aufwendungen gemäß § 5 Abs. 1 Satz 1 BVO BW bei der stationären Unterbringung in einer Privatklinik zu klären.