Legislator Case Law & Legislation
5 B 26/13, 5 B 26/13 (5 C 36/13) AI generated

Admission of revision on appropriateness of private clinic inpatient costs under public servant allowance law

Case Number 5 B 26/13, 5 B 26/13 (5 C 36/13)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) 5th Senate granted the defendant’s complaint for leave to appeal, finding it admissible and well-founded, and ordered that the pending revision be admitted for reasons of fundamental legal significance, thereby allowing the appellate court to review the lower decision regarding the stationing of the claimant in a private clinic. The case involved a dispute over the appropriateness (Angemessenheit) of healthcare expenses incurred for inpatient treatment in a private facility under the Baden-Württemberg Public Servants’ Allowance Ordinance (BVO BW). The decisive legal basis for the admission of the revision was § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, citing the need to clarify the interpretative standards for determining the financial appropriateness of such private sector healthcare costs under § 5 Abs. 1 Satz 1 BVO BW.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Admission of revision on appropriateness of private clinic inpatient costs under public servant allowance law: Die Beschwerde des Beklagten ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zugelassen.

Keywords

AI generated
administrative costs public sector medical expenses public institution user fee public hospital establishment admission to health insurance practice

Cited Legislation

AI generated
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Stationäre Unterbringung in einer Privatklinik; Beihilfefähigkeit der Aufwendungen; Revisionszulassung

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde des Beklagten ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zugelassen.

Die Revision kann dem Senat Gelegenheit geben, die Frage der Angemessenheit von Aufwendungen gemäß § 5 Abs. 1 Satz 1 BVO BW bei der stationären Unterbringung in einer Privatklinik zu klären.