Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
6 PB 12/13, 6 PB 12/13 (6 P 10/13) AI generated

Protection against termination for substitute youth representatives under public service law

Case Number 6 PB 12/13, 6 PB 12/13 (6 P 10/13)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court admitted an appeal as a legal review (Rechtsbeschwerde) and ordered the proceedings to continue under a unified case number, effectively allowing the appeal to proceed without deciding the merits. The dispute concerned whether substitute members of a youth representation body who stepped in for absent regular members were entitled to protection against continued employment termination (Weiterbeschäftigungsschutz). The admission was granted to resolve conflicting jurisprudence between the Federal Administrative Court and the Federal Labor Court regarding the scope of this protection for substitute representatives under public service law. The decisive legal basis was § 9 of the Federal Personnel Representation Act (BPersVG), interpreted in conjunction with §§ 83, 72, and 92 of the BPersVG and the German Labour Court Act (ArbGG).

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG, § 92a Satz 2 ArbGG, § 83 Abs. 2 BPersVG, § 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1, § 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG; Protection against termination for substitute youth representatives under public service law: The dispute concerned whether substitute members of a youth representation body who stepped in for absent regular members were entitled to protection against continued employment termination (Weiterbeschäftigungsschutz). The admission was granted to resolve conflicting jurisprudence between the Federal Administrative Court and the Federal Labor Court regarding the scope of this protection for substitute representatives under public service law. The decisive legal basis was § 9 of the Federal Personnel Representation Act (BPersVG), interpreted in conjunction with §§ 83, 72, and 92 of the BPersVG and the German Labour Court Act (ArbGG).

Keywords

AI generated
public employment law legal protection youth employment administrative personnel termination of proceedings procedural act

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG
1, § 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG zuzulassen.
§ 92a Satz 2 ArbGG
2 Satz 1, § 92a Satz 2 ArbGG).
§ 83 Abs. 2 BPersVG
Primary procedural basis for admitting the legal appeal and ordering the continuation of the proceedings under a unified case number.
§ 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1, § 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG
Procedural rules applied in conjunction with the BPersVG to determine the admissibility and handling of the legal appeal.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
BVerwGE 74, 280
Juni 1986 - BVerwG 6 P 27.84 - BVerwGE 74, 280 und vom 28.
BVerwGE 85, 5
Februar 1990 - BVerwG 6 P 21.87 - BVerwGE 85, 5 einerseits sowie BAG, Urteil vom 13.
6 AZR 207/85
März 1986 - 6 AZR 207/85 - BAGE 51, 261 andererseits).
BAGE 51, 261
März 1986 - 6 AZR 207/85 - BAGE 51, 261 andererseits).
AI generated
6 PB 13/13, 6 PB 13/13 (6 P 11/13)
Scope of continued employment protection for substitute members of youth representation under § 9 BPersVG
6 PB 6/13, 6 PB 6/13 (6 P 6/13)
Substitute youth committee members’ entitlement to continued employment protection under § 9 BPersVG
6 PB 7/13, 6 PB 7/13 (6 P 7/13)
Continuation of legal appeal to resolve conflicting authority on termination protection for successor alternate members of public service youth bodies
6 P 6/13
Continued employment protection for temporary substitute youth representatives: duration of tenure irrelevant under § 9 BPersVG
6 P 11/13
Continued employment protection for substitute youth representatives under § 9 BPersVG: sufficiency of temporary substitute membership without continuous period

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 83 Abs. 2 BPersVG

Primary procedural basis for admitting the legal appeal and ordering the continuation of the proceedings under a unified case number.

§ 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1, § 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG

Procedural rules applied in conjunction with the BPersVG to determine the admissibility and handling of the legal appeal.

§ 72a Abs. 6, § 74 Abs. 1, § 92 Abs. 2 Satz 1, § 92a Satz 2 ArbGG

Provisions cited to define the two-month deadline for filing the grounds of appeal following the service of the decision.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Zulassung der Rechtsbeschwerde; Weiterbeschäftigungsschutz von Ersatzmitgliedern der Jugendvertretung

[GRUENDE]

Die Rechtsbeschwerde der Beteiligten zu 1 bis 3 ist gemäß § 83 Abs. 2 BPersVG i.V.m. § 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1, § 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG zuzulassen. Die vorliegende Sache gibt dem Senat Gelegenheit, die Rechtseinheit hinsichtlich der Frage herzustellen, unter welchen Umständen im Verhinderungsfall nachgerückter Ersatzmitglieder der Jugendvertretung den Weiterbeschäftigungsschutz nach § 9 BPersVG genießen (vgl. Beschlüsse vom 25. Juni 1986 - BVerwG 6 P 27.84 - BVerwGE 74, 280 und vom 28. Februar 1990 - BVerwG 6 P 21.87 - BVerwGE 85, 5 einerseits sowie BAG, Urteil vom 13. März 1986 - 6 AZR 207/85 - BAGE 51, 261 andererseits).

Das Beschwerdeverfahren wird nunmehr als Rechtsbeschwerdeverfahren unter dem Az.: BVerwG 6 P 10.13 fortgesetzt. Mit der Zustellung dieses Beschlusses beginnt die Rechtsbeschwerdebegründungsfrist von 2 Monaten (§ 72a Abs. 6, § 74 Abs. 1, § 92 Abs. 2 Satz 1, § 92a Satz 2 ArbGG).