Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
6 PB 13/13, 6 PB 13/13 (6 P 11/13) AI generated

Scope of continued employment protection for substitute members of youth representation under § 9 BPersVG

Case Number 6 PB 13/13, 6 PB 13/13 (6 P 11/13)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) ordered the admission of a legal appeal (Rechtsbeschwerde) filed by parties 1 through 3, converting the proceeding from a complaint (Beschwerde) into a legal appeal and continuing it under a new file number, while starting a two-month deadline for the appeal's substantive grounds. The dispute concerns whether substitute members of the youth representation who step in due to the unavailability of original members are entitled to continued employment protection under the Federal Personnel Representation Act (BPersVG). The court permitted the appeal to resolve conflicting jurisprudence between prior BVerwG decisions and a Federal Labor Court (BAG) ruling on the specific scope of continued employment protection for such substitute members in cases of prevention (Verhinderungsfall).

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG, § 92a Satz 2 ArbGG; Scope of continued employment protection for substitute members of youth representation under § 9 BPersVG: The dispute concerns whether substitute members of the youth representation who step in due to the unavailability of original members are entitled to continued employment protection under the Federal Personnel Representation Act (BPersVG). The court permitted the appeal to resolve conflicting jurisprudence between prior BVerwG decisions and a Federal Labor Court (BAG) ruling on the specific scope of continued employment protection for such substitute members in cases of prevention (Verhinderungsfall).

Keywords

AI generated
scope of protection youth employment employment status legal representation administrative complaint substitute work

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG
1, § 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG zuzulassen.
§ 92a Satz 2 ArbGG
2 Satz 1, § 92a Satz 2 ArbGG).

Cited Case Law

AI generated
BVerwGE 74, 280
Juni 1986 - BVerwG 6 P 27.84 - BVerwGE 74, 280 und vom 28.
BVerwGE 85, 5
Februar 1990 - BVerwG 6 P 21.87 - BVerwGE 85, 5 einerseits sowie BAG, Urteil vom 13.
6 AZR 207/85
März 1986 - 6 AZR 207/85 - BAGE 51, 261 andererseits).
BAGE 51, 261
März 1986 - 6 AZR 207/85 - BAGE 51, 261 andererseits).
AI generated
6 PB 6/13, 6 PB 6/13 (6 P 6/13)
Substitute youth committee members’ entitlement to continued employment protection under § 9 BPersVG
6 PB 12/13, 6 PB 12/13 (6 P 10/13)
Protection against termination for substitute youth representatives under public service law
6 P 11/13
Continued employment protection for substitute youth representatives under § 9 BPersVG: sufficiency of temporary substitute membership without continuous period
6 PB 21/11
Youth representative's continued employment on modified terms under § 9 BPersVG: requirement for specific advance specification of accepted working conditions
6 P 6/13
Continued employment protection for temporary substitute youth representatives: duration of tenure irrelevant under § 9 BPersVG

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 83 Abs. 2 BPersVG i.V.m. § 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1, § 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG

These provisions provide the legal basis for admitting the legal appeal (Rechtsbeschwerde) and converting the proceeding accordingly.

§ 72a Abs. 6, § 74 Abs. 1, § 92 Abs. 2 Satz 1, § 92a Satz 2 ArbGG

These procedural rules determine the two-month deadline for submitting the grounds of the legal appeal.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Die Rechtsbeschwerde der Beteiligten zu 1 bis 3 ist gemäß § 83 Abs. 2 BPersVG i.V.m. § 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1, § 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG zuzulassen. Die vorliegende Sache gibt dem Senat Gelegenheit, die Rechtseinheit hinsichtlich der Frage herzustellen, unter welchen Umständen im Verhinderungsfall nachgerückter Ersatzmitglieder der Jugendvertretung den Weiterbeschäftigungsschutz nach § 9 BPersVG genießen (vgl. Beschlüsse vom 25. Juni 1986 - BVerwG 6 P 27.84 - BVerwGE 74, 280 und vom 28. Februar 1990 - BVerwG 6 P 21.87 - BVerwGE 85, 5 einerseits sowie BAG, Urteil vom 13. März 1986 - 6 AZR 207/85 - BAGE 51, 261 andererseits).

Das Beschwerdeverfahren wird nunmehr als Rechtsbeschwerdeverfahren unter dem Aktenzeichen BVerwG 6 P 11.13 fortgesetzt. Mit der Zustellung dieses Beschlusses beginnt die Rechtsbeschwerdebegründungsfrist von 2 Monaten (§ 72a Abs. 6, § 74 Abs. 1, § 92 Abs. 2 Satz 1, § 92a Satz 2 ArbGG).