Legislator Case Law & Legislation
5 B 58/12, 5 B 58/12 (5 C 26/13) AI generated

Civil Service Medical Aid: Eligibility of Hospital Choice Services under § 17 KHEntgG

Case Number 5 B 58/12, 5 B 58/12 (5 C 26/13)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court admitted an appeal on points of law filed by the defendant, overturning the lower court’s refusal to do so, thereby allowing the case to proceed to the full bench for a final decision on its merits. The dispute concerns a challenge to the denial of civil service medical aid (Beihilfe) for "choice services" (Wahlleistungen) incurred during hospital treatment. The court determined that the legal question of how § 17 Abs. 2 Satz 1 Halbs. 2 KHEntgG applies to the eligibility of costs for choice services qualifies as a matter of fundamental importance, satisfying the statutory requirement for the admission of the appeal under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Civil Service Medical Aid: Eligibility of Hospital Choice Services under § 17 KHEntgG: The dispute concerns a challenge to the denial of civil service medical aid (Beihilfe) for "choice services" (Wahlleistungen) incurred during hospital treatment. The court determined that the legal question of how § 17 Abs. 2 Satz 1 Halbs. 2 KHEntgG applies to the eligibility of costs for choice services qualifies as a matter of fundamental importance, satisfying the statutory requirement for the admission of the appeal under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO.

Keywords

AI generated
decisions on medical matters challenge of administrative decisions legal aid civil service matter in dispute statutory requirement

Cited Legislation

AI generated
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Cited as the procedural basis for the main ground of the verdict, justifying the admission of the appeal on points of law due to the fundamental importance of the legal question.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Beihilfe; Wahlleistung

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde des Beklagten ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen.

Die Revision kann dem Senat Gelegenheit geben, Fragen der Auslegung des § 17 Abs. 2 Satz 1 Halbs. 2 KHEntgG im Hinblick auf die Beihilfefähigkeit von Aufwendungen für Wahlleistungen zu klären.