Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
6 PB 6/13, 6 PB 6/13 (6 P 6/13) AI generated

Substitute youth committee members’ entitlement to continued employment protection under § 9 BPersVG

Case Number 6 PB 6/13, 6 PB 6/13 (6 P 6/13)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court admitted the legal appeal of the employer, converting the proceedings into a full legal appeal review (Aktenzeichen 6 P 6.13) to resolve a conflict in case law; the case involves a dispute over whether substitute youth committee members who stepped in due to a principal's absence are entitled to continued employment protection under § 9 of the Public Employment Relations Act (BPersVG); the key legal issue is the interpretation of § 9 BPersVG in conjunction with § 83 BPersVG, § 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1, and § 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG, specifically reconciling divergent prior rulings from the Federal Labour Court and earlier Federal Administrative Court decisions regarding the scope of protection for such representatives.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG, § 92a Satz 2 ArbGG, § 83 Abs. 2 BPersVG, § 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 ArbGG; Substitute youth committee members’ entitlement to continued employment protection under § 9 BPersVG: 2 Nr. 1, and § 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG, specifically reconciling divergent prior rulings from the Federal Labour Court and earlier Federal Administrative Court decisions regarding the scope of protection for such representatives.

Keywords

AI generated
public employment law legal protection youth employment labour dispute full employment action by staff

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG
Procedural rule cited in the dispositive to justify the admission of the legal appeal.
§ 92a Satz 2 ArbGG
2 Satz 1, § 92a Satz 2 ArbGG).
§ 83 Abs. 2 BPersVG
Main ground cited in the dispositive to admit the legal appeal (Rechtsbeschwerde).
§ 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 ArbGG
Procedural rule cited in the dispositive to justify the admission of the legal appeal.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
BVerwGE 74, 280
Juni 1986 - BVerwG 6 P 27.84 - BVerwGE 74, 280 und vom 28.
BVerwGE 85, 5
Februar 1990 - BVerwG 6 P 21.87 - BVerwGE 85, 5 einerseits sowie BAG, Urteil vom 13.
6 AZR 207/85
März 1986 - 6 AZR 207/85 - BAGE 51, 261 andererseits).
BAGE 51, 261
März 1986 - 6 AZR 207/85 - BAGE 51, 261 andererseits).
AI generated
6 PB 13/13, 6 PB 13/13 (6 P 11/13)
Scope of continued employment protection for substitute members of youth representation under § 9 BPersVG
6 PB 12/13, 6 PB 12/13 (6 P 10/13)
Protection against termination for substitute youth representatives under public service law
6 P 11/13
Continued employment protection for substitute youth representatives under § 9 BPersVG: sufficiency of temporary substitute membership without continuous period
6 P 6/13
Continued employment protection for temporary substitute youth representatives: duration of tenure irrelevant under § 9 BPersVG
6 PB 21/11
Youth representative's continued employment on modified terms under § 9 BPersVG: requirement for specific advance specification of accepted working conditions

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 83 Abs. 2 BPersVG

Main ground cited in the dispositive to admit the legal appeal (Rechtsbeschwerde).

§ 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 ArbGG

Procedural rule cited in the dispositive to justify the admission of the legal appeal.

§ 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG

Procedural rule cited in the dispositive to justify the admission of the legal appeal.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Nachgerückte Ersatzmitglieder der Jugendvertretung; Weiterbeschäftigungsschutz

[GRUENDE]

Die Rechtsbeschwerde der Beteiligten zu 1 bis 3 ist gemäß § 83 Abs. 2 BPersVG i.V.m. § 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1, § 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG zuzulassen. Die vorliegende Sache gibt dem Senat Gelegenheit, die Rechtseinheit hinsichtlich der Frage herzustellen, unter welchen Umständen im Verhinderungsfall nachgerückte Ersatzmitglieder der Jugendvertretung den Weiterbeschäftigungsschutz nach § 9 BPersVG genießen (vgl. Beschlüsse vom 25. Juni 1986 - BVerwG 6 P 27.84 - BVerwGE 74, 280 und vom 28. Februar 1990 - BVerwG 6 P 21.87 - BVerwGE 85, 5 einerseits sowie BAG, Urteil vom 13. März 1986 - 6 AZR 207/85 - BAGE 51, 261 andererseits).

Das Beschwerdeverfahren wird nunmehr als Rechtsbeschwerdeverfahren unter dem Aktenzeichen BVerwG 6 P 6.13 fortgesetzt. Mit der Zustellung dieses Beschlusses beginnt die Rechtsbeschwerdebegründungsfrist von 2 Monaten (§ 72a Abs. 6, § 74 Abs. 1, § 92 Abs. 2 Satz 1, § 92a Satz 2 ArbGG).