Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
6 PB 7/13, 6 PB 7/13 (6 P 7/13) AI generated

Continuation of legal appeal to resolve conflicting authority on termination protection for successor alternate members of public service youth bodies

Case Number 6 PB 7/13, 6 PB 7/13 (6 P 7/13)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) ordered the continuation of the proceedings as a legal appeal (Rechtsbeschwerde) under the docket number BVerwG 6 P 7.13 and initiated a two-month period for the appellant to file a written justification. This procedural decision resolved a dispute regarding whether successor alternate members of a youth body in public service are entitled to protection against termination (Weiterbeschäftigungsschutz) in cases of prevention, a matter that had produced conflicting rulings between the BVerwG and the Federal Labor Court (BAG). The court authorized the review based on the need to establish legal unity for this specific issue, relying on §§ 83(2) BPersVG, 72(2) No. 1, and 92(1) Sentence 2 ArbGG in conjunction with § 9 BPersVG, while noting that the underlying substantive question of protection scope remains to be decided in the ongoing legal appeal.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG, § 92a Satz 2 ArbGG; Continuation of legal appeal to resolve conflicting authority on termination protection for successor alternate members of public service youth bodies: This procedural decision resolved a dispute regarding whether successor alternate members of a youth body in public service are entitled to protection against termination (Weiterbeschäftigungsschutz) in cases of prevention, a matter that had produced conflicting rulings between the BVerwG and the Federal Labor Court (BAG). The court authorized the review based on the need to establish legal unity for this specific issue, relying on §§ 83(2) BPersVG, 72(2) No. 1, and 92(1) Sentence 2 ArbGG in conjunction with § 9 BPersVG, while noting that the underlying substantive question of protection scope remains to be decided in the ongoing legal appeal.

Keywords

AI generated
unity of the legal order termination of proceedings matter in dispute legal protection administrative authority procedural review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG
1, § 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG zuzulassen.
§ 92a Satz 2 ArbGG
2 Satz 1, § 92a Satz 2 ArbGG).

Cited Case Law

AI generated
BVerwGE 74, 280
Juni 1986 - BVerwG 6 P 27.84 - BVerwGE 74, 280 und vom 28.
BVerwGE 85, 5
Februar 1990 - BVerwG 6 P 21.87 - BVerwGE 85, 5 einerseits sowie BAG, Urteil vom 13.
6 AZR 207/85
März 1986 - 6 AZR 207/85 - BAGE 51, 261 andererseits).
BAGE 51, 261
März 1986 - 6 AZR 207/85 - BAGE 51, 261 andererseits).
AI generated
6 PB 12/13, 6 PB 12/13 (6 P 10/13)
Protection against termination for substitute youth representatives under public service law
6 PB 13/13, 6 PB 13/13 (6 P 11/13)
Scope of continued employment protection for substitute members of youth representation under § 9 BPersVG
6 PB 6/13, 6 PB 6/13 (6 P 6/13)
Substitute youth committee members’ entitlement to continued employment protection under § 9 BPersVG
6 PB 7/12
Scope of youth representative's continued-employment protection: exclusion of public-law preparatory service in the higher civil service
6 PB 21/11
Youth representative's continued employment on modified terms under § 9 BPersVG: requirement for specific advance specification of accepted working conditions

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 83 Abs. 2 BPersVG i.V.m. § 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1, § 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG

Basis for admitting the legal appeal (Rechtsbeschwerde) to establish legal unity regarding the protection of successor alternate members of the youth body.

§ 72a Abs. 6, § 74 Abs. 1, § 92 Abs. 2 Satz 1, § 92a Satz 2 ArbGG

Procedural basis for continuing the proceedings as a legal appeal and initiating the two-month deadline for filing the appeal justification.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Nachgerückte Ersatzmitglieder der Jugendvertretung; Weiterbeschäftigungsschutz

[GRUENDE]

Die Rechtsbeschwerde der Beteiligten zu 1 bis 3 ist gemäß § 83 Abs. 2 BPersVG i.V.m. § 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1, § 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG zuzulassen. Die vorliegende Sache gibt dem Senat Gelegenheit, die Rechtseinheit hinsichtlich der Frage herzustellen, unter welchen Umständen im Verhinderungsfall nachgerückte Ersatzmitglieder der Jugendvertretung den Weiterbeschäftigungsschutz nach § 9 BPersVG genießen (vgl. Beschlüsse vom 25. Juni 1986 - BVerwG 6 P 27.84 - BVerwGE 74, 280 und vom 28. Februar 1990 - BVerwG 6 P 21.87 - BVerwGE 85, 5 einerseits sowie BAG, Urteil vom 13. März 1986 - 6 AZR 207/85 - BAGE 51, 261 andererseits).

Das Beschwerdeverfahren wird nunmehr als Rechtsbeschwerdeverfahren unter dem Aktenzeichen BVerwG 6 P 7.13 fortgesetzt. Mit der Zustellung dieses Beschlusses beginnt die Rechtsbeschwerdebegründungsfrist von 2 Monaten (§ 72a Abs. 6, § 74 Abs. 1, § 92 Abs. 2 Satz 1, § 92a Satz 2 ArbGG).