Legislator Case Law & Legislation
2 B 47/12, 2 B 47/12 (2 C 22/13) AI generated

Effect of mandatory occupational integration management on civil service retirement eligibility

Case Number 2 B 47/12, 2 B 47/12 (2 C 22/13)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted the plaintiff's complaint and admitted a revision to the Federal Court of Justice, effectively prevailing for the plaintiff at the procedural level by allowing the case to proceed for a decision on its merits. The dispute concerns a civil servant's retirement due to unfitness for service, specifically challenging whether the employer fulfilled its statutory obligation to initiate occupational integration management (BEM) before ordering retirement. The decisive legal basis involves the interplay between § 84 Abs. 2 Satz 1 SGB IX (mandatory occupational integration management) and § 44 Abs. 1 Satz 1 BBG (civil service retirement), with the court identifying a question of fundamental importance regarding the weight of BEM procedures in retirement decisions under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 84 Abs. 2 Satz 1 SGB IX, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 5 Satz 2, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Effect of mandatory occupational integration management on civil service retirement eligibility: The dispute concerns a civil servant's retirement due to unfitness for service, specifically challenging whether the employer fulfilled its statutory obligation to initiate occupational integration management (BEM) before ordering retirement. The decisive legal basis involves the interplay between § 84 Abs. 2 Satz 1 SGB IX (mandatory occupational integration management) and § 44 Abs. 1 Satz 1 BBG (civil service retirement), with the court identifying a question of fundamental importance regarding the weight of BEM procedures in retirement decisions under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO.

Keywords

AI generated
retirement civil service administrative compliance law of obligations integration into employment procedural orders

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for admitting the revision due to the fundamental legal importance of the question regarding occupational integration management in retirement decisions.
§ 84 Abs. 2 Satz 1 SGB IX
Sie kann dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Frage geben, welche Bedeutung dem betrieblichen Eingliederungsmanagement (BEM) gemäß § 84 Abs. 2 Satz 1 SGB IX für die Zurruhesetzung eines Beamten gemäß § 44 Abs.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
5 Satz 2, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG und entspricht der Streitwertfestsetzung in den Vorinstanzen (Hälfte des 13-fachen Betrages des Endgrundgehalts samt ruhegehaltsfähigen Zulagen).
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 5 Satz 2, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Procedural basis cited for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for admitting the revision due to the fundamental legal importance of the question regarding occupational integration management in retirement decisions.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 5 Satz 2, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Procedural basis cited for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Dienstunfähigkeit; Versetzung in den Ruhestand; betriebliches Eingliederungsmanagement

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Frage geben, welche Bedeutung dem betrieblichen Eingliederungsmanagement (BEM) gemäß § 84 Abs. 2 Satz 1 SGB IX für die Zurruhesetzung eines Beamten gemäß § 44 Abs. 1 Satz 1 BBG zukommt.

Die vorläufige Festsetzung des Streitwerts für das Revisionsverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 5 Satz 2, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG und entspricht der Streitwertfestsetzung in den Vorinstanzen (Hälfte des 13-fachen Betrages des Endgrundgehalts samt ruhegehaltsfähigen Zulagen).