Legislator Case Law & Legislation
5 B 5/13, 5 B 5/13 (5 C 19/13) AI generated

Social welfare agency’s BAföG cost recovery: whether Section 46 requires a prior application

Case Number 5 B 5/13, 5 B 5/13 (5 C 19/13)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) dismissed the defendant's appeal for lack of prospects of success and granted the plaintiff's leave to appeal on grounds of fundamental legal importance, thereby upholding the lower instance decision in favor of the plaintiff. The dispute arose from a cost reimbursement claim brought by a social welfare agency against a Federal Office for Education and Scholarship, concerning the legal requirements for initiating such claims in the context of educational support. The pivotal legal issue identified for further review is whether a formal application is required under Section 46 of the Federal Education and Scholarship Promotion Act (BAföG) for a social welfare agency to demand reimbursement from the Federal Office for Education and Scholarship.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Social welfare agency’s BAföG cost recovery: whether Section 46 requires a prior application: Die Beschwerde des Klägers ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen.

Keywords

AI generated
reimbursement of costs formal requirements cost recovery financial assistance leave on social grounds ground for review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Ausbildungsförderung; Erstattungsstreit

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde des Klägers ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen.

Die Revision kann dem Senat Gelegenheit geben, die grundsätzliche Frage zu klären, ob in einem Erstattungsstreit eines Sozialhilfeträgers gegenüber einem Amt für Ausbildungsförderung ein Antragserfordernis im Sinne von § 46 BAföG besteht.