Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
6 B 23/12, 6 B 23/12 (6 C 2/13) AI generated

Prerequisites for dominant media power under § 26 RStV in employment disputes with broadcasters

Case Number 6 B 23/12, 6 B 23/12 (6 C 2/13)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted leave to appeal for the petitioner, ordering that the case proceed to the Senate for a full review on the merits. The dispute concerned a regulatory decision involving a television broadcaster and the determination of whether it held dominant media power (vorherrschende Meinungsmacht) under German media law. The court based its decision on § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, finding that the legal question of the precise prerequisites for establishing dominant media power under § 26 Abs. 1 RStV possesses fundamental significance and requires further clarification by the Senate.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Prerequisites for dominant media power under § 26 RStV in employment disputes with broadcasters: The dispute concerned a regulatory decision involving a television broadcaster and the determination of whether it held dominant media power (vorherrschende Meinungsmacht) under German media law. The court based its decision on § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, finding that the legal question of the precise prerequisites for establishing dominant media power under § 26 Abs. 1 RStV possesses fundamental significance and requires further clarification by the Senate.

Keywords

AI generated
media law power of decision broadcasting right ground for review full employment trade union rights

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Serves as the main ground for granting leave to appeal (Revisionserlaubnis) due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue regarding dominant media power.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Procedural basis cited in the dispositive for the determination of the amount in dispute (Streitwert) for the complaint proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Procedural basis cited in the dispositive for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
AI generated
6 C 2/13
Media concentration control: predominance of opinion in TV markets and the statutory 20% viewer-share threshold for cross-media influence under § 26 RStV
6 B 11/11, 6 B 11/11 (6 C 22/11)
State broadcasting law: constitutional limits on confiscating advertising revenues from unlawful broadcasts
6 C 22/11
Forfeiture of advertising revenue for broadcast violations: constitutional competence and proportionality of regulatory sanction
6 B 58/14
Administrative jurisdiction over contractual remuneration claims arising from public-law must-carry broadcasting obligations
6 B 34/19, 6 B 34/19 (6 C 25/19)
Klagebefugnis einer Landesmedienanstalt gegen bundesweit gültigen Zulassungsbescheid einer anderen Landesmedienanstalt

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Serves as the main ground for granting leave to appeal (Revisionserlaubnis) due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue regarding dominant media power.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Procedural basis cited in the dispositive for the determination of the amount in dispute (Streitwert) for the complaint proceedings.

§ 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Procedural basis cited in the dispositive for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revisionszulassung wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung; vorherrschende Meinungsmacht; Fernsehveranstalter

[GRUENDE]

Die Revision ist jedenfalls gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen. Das Revisionsverfahren kann dem Senat Gelegenheit geben, die Voraussetzungen für die Annahme vorherrschender Meinungsmacht im Sinne von § 26 Abs. 1 RStV weiterer Klärung zuzuführen.

Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.