Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
5 B 90/12, 5 B 90/12 (5 C 6/13) AI generated

BAföG: Recalculation of social security deduction upon changed professional circumstances

Case Number 5 B 90/12, 5 B 90/12 (5 C 6/13)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) allowed the plaintiff’s appeal and admitted a revision on grounds of fundamental legal importance, effectively halting the lower court’s dismissal and directing the appellate proceedings for a final substantive ruling. The dispute concerned a student’s application for the recalculation of Basic Education Allowance (BAföG) benefits, specifically challenging the determination of the standard deduction for social security expenses when professional circumstances change. The decisive legal issue centers on the correct calculation of the flat-rate amount under § 21 Abs. 2 BAföG in conjunction with the provisions for updating applications based on altered professional conditions under § 24 Abs. 3 BAföG, as well as the procedural admissibility of a revision under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; BAföG: Recalculation of social security deduction upon changed professional circumstances: Die Beschwerde des Klägers ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen.

Keywords

AI generated
social security benefits deduction of professional expenses education allowance recalculation of pension revision of a judgment changed circumstances

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen.
AI generated
5 C 6/13
Calculation of social security lump sums by calendar year in BAföG actualization applications
B 4 AS 12/22 B
BAföG retroactive payments: income attribution under old SGB II and lack of clarification need after statutory amendment
B 7 AS 11/24 R
Recovery of erroneous BAföG payments from Jobcenter based on substantive congruence of benefits under § 105 SGB X
B 4 AS 8/25 R
Non-deductibility of private vocational school fees from BAföG income under § 11b SGB II
5 C 11/13
Effect of missing BAföG application on social welfare reimbursement claim under § 104 SGB X

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

BAföG: Aktualisierungsantrag; Aufwendungen zur sozialen Sicherung

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde des Klägers ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen.

Die Revision kann dem Senat Gelegenheit geben, die Frage der richtigen Ermittlung der Pauschale für Aufwendungen zur sozialen Sicherung im Sinne des § 21 Abs. 2 BAföG bei sich ändernden Berufsverhältnissen und darauf beruhenden Aktualisierungsanträgen im Sinne von § 24 Abs. 3 BAföG zu klären.