Legislator Case Law & Legislation
5 B 82/12, 5 B 82/12 (5 C 8/13) AI generated

Reimbursement between social welfare and student aid agencies: applicability of § 46 BAföG application requirement

Case Number 5 B 82/12, 5 B 82/12 (5 C 8/13)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court allowed the plaintiff's complaint and granted leave for appeal based on the fundamental importance of the legal issue, thereby permitting the case to proceed to a full trial on the merits. The dispute concerned a reimbursement claim filed by a social welfare agency against an education support office, challenging the latter's decision in the context of student financial aid benefits. The court held that the case presented a question of fundamental significance requiring clarification: whether a specific application requirement under § 46 of the Federal Education and Training Act (BAföG) applies to reimbursement disputes between a social welfare provider and an education support authority.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 46 BAföG; Reimbursement between social welfare and student aid agencies: applicability of § 46 BAföG application requirement: The dispute concerned a reimbursement claim filed by a social welfare agency against an education support office, challenging the latter's decision in the context of student financial aid benefits. The court held that the case presented a question of fundamental significance requiring clarification: whether a specific application requirement under § 46 of the Federal Education and Training Act (BAföG) applies to reimbursement disputes between a social welfare provider and an education support authority.

Keywords

AI generated
application to an administrative authority financial support legal aid social assistance authority reimbursement obligation social insurance dispute

Cited Legislation

AI generated
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Provision cited in the dispositive as the ground for granting leave to appeal due to the fundamental importance of the legal issue.

§ 46 BAföG

Substantive provision identified in the dispositive as the subject of the fundamental legal question requiring clarification in the reimbursement dispute.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Erstattungsstreit; Antrag auf Bewilligung von Leistungen der Ausbildungsförderung

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde des Klägers ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen.

Die Revision kann dem Senat Gelegenheit geben, die grundsätzliche Frage zu klären, ob in einem Erstattungsstreit eines Sozialhilfeträgers gegenüber einem Amt für Ausbildungsförderung ein Antragserfordernis im Sinne von § 46 BAföG besteht.