Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
7 B 44/12, 7 B 44/12 (7 C 2/13) AI generated

Statutory Definition of Waste Producer Under Waste Law

Case Number 7 B 44/12, 7 B 44/12 (7 C 2/13)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) 7th Senate granted leave for appeal, allowing the case to proceed to the full Senate due to the fundamental importance of the legal issues involved, thereby rejecting the lower instance's dismissal. The dispute concerns the determination of the "waste producer" (Abfallerzeuger) under German waste law, specifically challenging the legal definition and attribution of this status within the administrative framework. The decisive legal basis for the admissibility of the appeal is Section 132 Paragraph 2 Number 1 of the Administrative Court Procedure Act (VwGO), which permits revision on grounds of fundamental significance, with the core substantive issue governed by Section 3 Paragraph 5 of the Circular Economy and Waste Act (KrW-/AbfG) and Section 3 Paragraph 8 of the Waste Act (KrWG).

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 GKG; Statutory Definition of Waste Producer Under Waste Law: The dispute concerns the determination of the "waste producer" (Abfallerzeuger) under German waste law, specifically challenging the legal definition and attribution of this status within the administrative framework. The decisive legal basis for the admissibility of the appeal is Section 132 Paragraph 2 Number 1 of the Administrative Court Procedure Act (VwGO), which permits revision on grounds of fundamental significance, with the core substantive issue governed by Section 3 Paragraph 5 of the Circular Economy and Waste Act (KrW-/AbfG) and Section 3 Paragraph 8 of the Waste Act (KrWG).

Keywords

AI generated
statutory grounds waste disposal legal status fight against wastage non-recoverable waste environmental standard

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for allowing the appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal issues involved.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG, für das Revisionsverfahren aus § 47 Abs.
§ 63 Abs. 1 GKG
Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, für das Revisionsverfahren aus § 47 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Provision cited for the determination of the amount in dispute in the complaint proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 GKG
Provision cited for the determination of the amount in dispute in the revision proceedings.
AI generated
7 B 29/13, 7 B 29/13 (7 C 8/14)
Eligibility of partnerships for commercial waste collection and criteria for termination of collection activities under waste management law.
7 B 25/12
Abgrenzung von Bundes- und Landesrecht bei abfallrechtlicher Beseitigungsanordnung: Störerhaftung unter Vorrang des § 62 KrWG
7 B 26/11
Statutory interpretation of "commercial collection" under waste law and binding effect of prior appellate review on lower courts
7 B 17/21
Waste disposal liability of property owner vs. former tenant officers: definition of Abfallbesitzer and Störerhaftung under KrWG
7 B 30/13, 7 B 30/13 (7 C 9/14)
Admissibility of Revision to clarify legal capacity of partnerships as waste collectors and termination of commercial collection activity under § 3 Abs. 10 KrWG

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for allowing the appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal issues involved.

§ 47 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Provision cited for the determination of the amount in dispute in the complaint proceedings.

§ 47 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 GKG

Provision cited for the determination of the amount in dispute in the revision proceedings.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Bestimmung des Abfallerzeugers

[GRUENDE]

Die zulässige Beschwerde ist begründet. Die Revision ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO) zuzulassen. Das Revisionsverfahren kann dem Senat voraussichtlich Gelegenheit geben, den Begriff des Abfallerzeugers (§ 3 Abs. 5 KrW-/AbfG, § 3 Abs. 8 KrWG) zu klären.

Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, für das Revisionsverfahren aus § 47 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.