Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
3 B 21/12, 3 B 21/12 (3 C 29/12) AI generated

Common Agricultural Policy: Scope of evidence required in single payment scheme collective applications under Regulation (EC) No 796/2004

Case Number 3 B 21/12, 3 B 21/12 (3 C 29/12)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted the applicant’s appeal and admitted the revision, finding that the case holds fundamental legal significance under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, thereby allowing the dispute to proceed to the revision instance. The case concerns a challenge to a decision regarding the Single Payment Scheme under the Common Agricultural Policy, specifically addressing whether a collective application ("Sammelantrag") obliges the applicant to submit evidence establishing eligibility for aid. The decisive legal issue is the interpretation of Article 12(1) of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004, requiring clarification on whether this provision mandates the submission of information necessary to determine aid eligibility via the collective application process.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Common Agricultural Policy: Scope of evidence required in single payment scheme collective applications under Regulation (EC) No 796/2004: Die Beschwerde hat Erfolg. Der Rechtssache kommt die vom Kläger behauptete grundsätzliche Bedeutung zu (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO). Im Revisionsverfahren wird voraussichtlich die Frage zu klären sein, ob und inwieweit Art. 12 Abs. 1 VO (EG) Nr. 796/2004 dahin auszulegen ist, dass mit dem Sammelantrag Nachweise über die zur Feststellung der Beihilfefähigkeit erforderlichen Informationen vorzulegen sind.

Keywords

AI generated
common provisions agricultural policy evidentiary gap application for revision challenge of administrative decisions information policy

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Der Rechtssache kommt die vom Kläger behauptete grundsätzliche Bedeutung zu (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO).
AI generated
1 B 32/23
Agricultural Subsidies and EU State Aid: Admissibility of Compensation Claims for Ex-Post Application of Reduced Payment Rates
3 B 91/12
OGS Approval for Agricultural Payment Claims: Validity of National Filing Requirements and Correction of Missing Application as Obvious Error
3 C 21/17
Publicity of CAP aid recipients: compatibility of personal data disclosure with privacy rights and proportionality requirements
3 C 25/12
EU agricultural aid denial: validity of cross-compliance reference to national law and effect of obstructing on-site controls
3 B 31/19, 3 B 31/19 (3 C 8/20)
Eligibility of agricultural parcels below minimum size thresholds for payment claims under EU Regulations 639/2014 and 1306/2013

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Gemeinsame Agrarpolitik; Betriebsprämienregelung; Sammelantrag; Nachweis zur Beihilfefähigkeit; Revisionszulassung

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde hat Erfolg. Der Rechtssache kommt die vom Kläger behauptete grundsätzliche Bedeutung zu (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO). Im Revisionsverfahren wird voraussichtlich die Frage zu klären sein, ob und inwieweit Art. 12 Abs. 1 VO (EG) Nr. 796/2004 dahin auszulegen ist, dass mit dem Sammelantrag Nachweise über die zur Feststellung der Beihilfefähigkeit erforderlichen Informationen vorzulegen sind.