Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
4 B 47/11, 4 B 47/11 (4 C 15/12) AI generated

Impairment of monument protection interests by a rural-area project under § 35 Abs. 3 Satz 1 Nr. 5 Alt. 4 BauGB

Case Number 4 B 47/11, 4 B 47/11 (4 C 15/12)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted leave to appeal, finding the appellant's complaint well-founded and allowing the case to proceed to the appellate level. The dispute concerned a land-use planning matter involving a non-standard project in the rural area, specifically challenging whether such a project infringes upon public interests related to monument protection. The court determined that the revision proceedings are necessary to clarify the legal prerequisites under § 35 Abs. 2 and § 35 Abs. 3 Satz 1 Nr. 5 Alt. 4 BauGB, which govern the assessment of public interests and potential impairments of heritage protection for projects outside of zoned urban areas.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 35 Abs. 2 BauGB, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Impairment of monument protection interests by a rural-area project under § 35 Abs. 3 Satz 1 Nr. 5 Alt. 4 BauGB: The dispute concerned a land-use planning matter involving a non-standard project in the rural area, specifically challenging whether such a project infringes upon public interests related to monument protection. The court determined that the revision proceedings are necessary to clarify the legal prerequisites under § 35 Abs. 2 and § 35 Abs. 3 Satz 1 Nr. 5 Alt. 4 BauGB, which govern the assessment of public interests and potential impairments of heritage protection for projects outside of zoned urban areas.

Keywords

AI generated
rural areas protection of the public interest protection of historical monuments urban planning related proceedings level of protection

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for granting leave to appeal due to the need to clarify a fundamental legal question regarding public interests in monument protection.
§ 35 Abs. 2 BauGB
1 VwGO zuzulassen, weil das Revisionsverfahren zur Klärung der Frage beitragen kann, unter welchen Voraussetzungen ein sonstiges Vorhaben im Außenbereich (§ 35 Abs. 2 BauGB) öffentliche Belange des Denkmalschutzes beeinträchtigt (§ 35 Abs.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Legal basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the appellate proceedings.
AI generated
4 C 15/12
Loss of heritage protection as a defense to demolition orders for unapproved rural construction measures
4 B 47/13
Wind turbine in rural zone: balancing monument protection under § 35(3) No. 5 BauGB against regional wind energy planning
4 BN 36/19
Standing to challenge a rural area ordinance: property owner status and balancing of private interests under § 35 Abs. 6 BauGB
4 B 22/21
Rural fringe construction: land-use plan designations do not override § 35 Abs. 3 BauGB public interests
4 B 28/17
Monument owner's standing to challenge environmental impairment: constitutional requirement for third-party protection in heritage law

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for granting leave to appeal due to the need to clarify a fundamental legal question regarding public interests in monument protection.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Legal basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the appellate proceedings.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revisionszulassung; Voraussetzungen für die Beeinträchtigung der öffentlichen Belange des Denkmalschutzes durch ein sonstiges Vorhaben im Außenbereich

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde ist begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen, weil das Revisionsverfahren zur Klärung der Frage beitragen kann, unter welchen Voraussetzungen ein sonstiges Vorhaben im Außenbereich (§ 35 Abs. 2 BauGB) öffentliche Belange des Denkmalschutzes beeinträchtigt (§ 35 Abs. 3 Satz 1 Nr. 5 Alt. 4 BauGB).

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.