Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
1 B 11/12, 1 B 11/12 (1 C 17/12) AI generated

Eligibility of well-integrated minors for residence permits: Interplay of § 25a(1) and general conditions under § 5(1) Residence Act

Case Number 1 B 11/12, 1 B 11/12 (1 C 17/12)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court granted the plaintiff's complaint for leave to appeal, allowing the case to proceed to the supreme court level on the grounds that the issue possesses fundamental legal significance. The dispute concerns the conditions for granting residence permits to well-integrated minors and young adults under § 25a(1) of the Residence Act, specifically challenging the requirement to satisfy the general mandatory issuance conditions of § 5(1) of the Residence Act. The decision rests on § 132(2)(1) of the Administrative Court Procedure Act, establishing that the appeal is admissible because it enables the court to clarify how the general eligibility criteria interact with the specific provisions for well-integrated youth.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 25a Abs. 1 AufenthG, § 5 Abs. 1 AufenthG; Eligibility of well-integrated minors for residence permits: Interplay of § 25a(1) and general conditions under § 5(1) Residence Act: The dispute concerns the conditions for granting residence permits to well-integrated minors and young adults under § 25a(1) of the Residence Act, specifically challenging the requirement to satisfy the general mandatory issuance conditions of § 5(1) of the Residence Act. The decision rests on § 132(2)(1) of the Administrative Court Procedure Act, establishing that the appeal is admissible because it enables the court to clarify how the general eligibility criteria interact with the specific provisions for well-integrated youth.

Keywords

AI generated
residence permits legal status of minor administrative complaint applicability of immigration law rule of legal domicile citizenship

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Procedural basis cited to admit the appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal question regarding the conditions for granting residence permits.
§ 25a Abs. 1 AufenthG
Sie kann dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Voraussetzungen für die Erteilung einer Aufenthaltserlaubnis nach § 25a Abs. 1 AufenthG geben, insbesondere in Bezug auf die allgemeinen Regelerteilungsvoraussetzungen des § 5 Abs.
§ 5 Abs. 1 AufenthG
1 AufenthG geben, insbesondere in Bezug auf die allgemeinen Regelerteilungsvoraussetzungen des § 5 Abs. 1 AufenthG.
AI generated
1 C 17/12
Applicability of general identity and passport requirements to residence permits for integrated youth
1 B 32/10, 1 B 32/10, 1 PKH 21/10
Derivative residence rights of minors and admissibility of revision concerning attribution of parental offenses
2 BvR 611/15
Exclusion of tolerated residence periods from interest balancing under § 25(5) AufenthG in deportation cases
1 C 13/23
Minor's eligibility for chance residence permit and exemption from declaration of commitment to free and democratic basic order
1 B 13/11, 1 B 13/11, 1 PKH 10/11
Residence permit eligibility under § 25 Abs. 5 AufenthG: EU preliminary ruling obligation absent for domestic appealable decisions and Art. 8 ECHR interpretation of tolerated residence

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Procedural basis cited to admit the appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal question regarding the conditions for granting residence permits.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Voraussetzungen für Aufenthaltsgewährung bei gut integrierten Jugendlichen und Heranwachsenden; Revisionszulassung

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde der Klägerin ist zulässig und begründet.

Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Voraussetzungen für die Erteilung einer Aufenthaltserlaubnis nach § 25a Abs. 1 AufenthG geben, insbesondere in Bezug auf die allgemeinen Regelerteilungsvoraussetzungen des § 5 Abs. 1 AufenthG.