Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
10 B 9/12, 10 B 9/12 (10 C 17/12) AI generated

Deportation ban: Fundamental significance of danger to the public via custodial sentence under § 60 Abs. 8 AufenthG

Case Number 10 B 9/12, 10 B 9/12 (10 C 17/12)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court ordered the admission of a revision appeal to the same court, finding the complainant's complaint admissible and well-founded. The dispute concerned the application of deportation bans under German residency law, specifically whether a final conviction to a total custodial sentence meets the threshold for declaring a danger to the public. The court determined that the case holds fundamental legal significance under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, allowing the Bundesverwaltungsgericht to further clarify the statutory requirements of § 60 Abs. 8 Satz 1 Alt. 2 AufenthG regarding convictions for at least three years of imprisonment.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Deportation ban: Fundamental significance of danger to the public via custodial sentence under § 60 Abs. 8 AufenthG: The dispute concerned the application of deportation bans under German residency law, specifically whether a final conviction to a total custodial sentence meets the threshold for declaring a danger to the public. The court determined that the case holds fundamental legal significance under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, allowing the Bundesverwaltungsgericht to further clarify the statutory requirements of § 60 Abs. 8 Satz 1 Alt. 2 AufenthG regarding convictions for at least three years of imprisonment.

Keywords

AI generated
ban on deportation custodial sentence public danger statutory requirement restriction of liberty detention under immigration law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for admitting the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal matter.
AI generated
10 B 26/09, 10 B 26/09 (10 C 19/10)
Standards for judicial conviction in constitutional interpretation of deportation protection exceptions under § 60 Abs. 7 AufenthG
10 B 18/10, 10 B 18/10 (10 C 24/10)
Constitutionally compliant application of § 60 Abs. 7 AufenthG deportation ban: standards for judicial fact-finding in cases of general dangers
XIII ZB 13/20
Custodial detention for deportation: sufficiency of a danger-prevention order to establish presumed flight risk under the Return Directive
10 C 13/12
Deportation ban for unaccompanied minors: equivalent protection under § 58 Abs. 1a AufenthG prevents circumvention of § 60 Abs. 7 Satz 3 AufenthG
1 C 10.25
Scope of domestic deportation ban under § 60 Abs. 5 AufenthG and exclusion of family ties as grounds for in-country protection

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for admitting the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal matter.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Abschiebungsverbot; Verurteilung zu einer Gesamtfreiheitsstrafe; Revisionszulassung

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde ist zulässig und begründet.

Die Revision ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht Gelegenheit geben, die Voraussetzungen des § 60 Abs. 8 Satz 1 Alt. 2 AufenthG (Gefahr für die Allgemeinheit wegen rechtskräftiger Verurteilung zu einer Freiheitsstrafe von mindestens 3 Jahren) weiter zu klären.