Partial plan retention under § 75 Abs. 1a VwVfG following a defect in the balancing of interests
Germany (DE)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Federal Administrative Court admitted the appeal against the exclusion of revision, finding that the case possesses fundamental legal significance, and consequently remanded the matter to the Regional Administrative Court. The dispute centers on a planning approval decision (Planfeststellungsbeschluss), specifically challenging whether partial retention of a plan (Planerhaltung) is permissible following an identified defect in the balancing of interests (Abwägungsmangel). The decisive legal issue, which necessitates further judicial clarification, is the extent to which § 75 Abs. 1a Satz 2 of the German Administrative Procedure Act (VwVfG) enables the retention of a plan for only a portion of the proposed project.
Legislator headnote
AI generated§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Partial plan retention under § 75 Abs. 1a VwVfG following a defect in the balancing of interests: The dispute centers on a planning approval decision (Planfeststellungsbeschluss), specifically challenging whether partial retention of a plan (Planerhaltung) is permissible following an identified defect in the balancing of interests (Abwägungsmangel). The decisive legal issue, which necessitates further judicial clarification, is the extent to which § 75 Abs. 1a Satz 2 of the German Administrative Procedure Act (VwVfG) enables the retention of a plan for only a portion of the proposed project.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedBasis for admitting the complaint against the non-admission of revision due to the fundamental legal significance of the issue.
Full text
Planfeststellungsbeschluss; Planerhaltung bei Abwägungsmangel
[GRUENDE]
Die Beschwerde der Beigeladenen gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem angefochtenen Urteil ist begründet. Die Rechtssache hat grundsätzliche Bedeutung im Sinne des § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO. Sie wirft voraussichtlich u.a. die klärungsbedürftige Frage auf, inwieweit § 75 Abs. 1a Satz 2 VwVfG die Planerhaltung für einen Teil des Vorhabens ermöglicht.