Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
8 B 96/11, 8 B 96/11 (8 C 9/12) AI generated

Recognition of Austrian Master Builder qualification: Definition of “Architect” under Art. 10(c) Directive 2005/36/EC

Case Number 8 B 96/11, 8 B 96/11 (8 C 9/12)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court ordered the admission of the appeal to the Federal Administrative Court, granting the plaintiff's legal remedy and finding that the case involves a question of fundamental significance. The dispute concerned the recognition of a professional qualification as a "Master Builder" (Baumeister) obtained in Austria for practice in Germany, which had been challenged by the defendant authority. The court determined that the appeal must be reviewed to clarify the specific requirements imposed by Article 10(c) of Directive 2005/36/EC regarding the occupational term "Architect," thereby establishing the legal basis for the substantive review in the revision proceedings.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 4 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 4 GKG; Recognition of Austrian Master Builder qualification: Definition of “Architect” under Art. 10(c) Directive 2005/36/EC: The dispute concerned the recognition of a professional qualification as a "Master Builder" (Baumeister) obtained in Austria for practice in Germany, which had been challenged by the defendant authority. The court determined that the appeal must be reviewed to clarify the specific requirements imposed by Article 10(c) of Directive 2005/36/EC regarding the occupational term "Architect," thereby establishing the legal basis for the substantive review in the revision proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
qualification directive architect clause administrative authority substantive requirements town-planning profession revision proceedings

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Basis for admitting the revision appeal due to the presence of a question of fundamental significance.
§ 52 Abs. 4 GKG
1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 4 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 4 GKG
Legal basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
AI generated
10 C 5/15
Recognition of non-listed vocational qualification as architect under EU Directive 2005/36/EC: “special and extraordinary reasons” requirement and definition of architect profession
8 C 9/12
Interpretation of "specific and exceptional reasons" and professional qualifications for automatic recognition of an architect title under the Mutual Recognition Directive
I ZR 68/09
Use of regulated "Architect" title without local chamber registration: compatibility of national exclusivity requirement with EU freedom of establishment
2 C 9.25
Eligibility of architect-in-training periods as salaried experience for public service officers under the prohibition of prerequisite training
I ZR 172/08
Recognition of Austrian Master's Degree as Academic Title, Not Protected Specialist Designation, in Competition Law Context

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Basis for admitting the revision appeal due to the presence of a question of fundamental significance.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 4 GKG

Legal basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revisionszulassung; Berufsanerkennung

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde hat Erfolg. Der Rechtssache kommt die von dem Beklagten geltend gemachte grundsätzliche Bedeutung nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zu. Im Revisionsverfahren wird im Hinblick auf die vom Kläger in Österreich erworbene Qualifikation als Baumeister voraussichtlich zu klären sein, welche Anforderungen Art. 10 Buchst. c der Richtlinie 2005/36/EG mit dem Tatbestandsmerkmal "Architekt" stellt.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 4 GKG.