Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
8 B 89/11, 8 B 89/11 (8 C 3/12) AI generated

Permissibility of unwinding a fully performed public-law contract under § 60 VwVfG due to essential change of circumstances

Case Number 8 B 89/11, 8 B 89/11 (8 C 3/12)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court granted the defendant's appeal for leave to appeal, ruling that the case possesses fundamental legal significance and permitting the matter to proceed to full revision proceedings, while also setting the provisional disputed amount for the appeal. The dispute concerns the validity of the unwind of a fully performed public-law contract in light of a subsequent essential change in circumstances, challenging whether such an adjustment is permissible. The decisive legal issue centers on the applicability and prerequisites of Section 60 (1) of the Administrative Procedure Act (VwVfG) regarding contract adaptation versus retroactive unwinding, evaluated under Section 132 (2) No. 1 of the Administrative Court Rules (VwGO) for admission to revision.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 4 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 4 GKG; Permissibility of unwinding a fully performed public-law contract under § 60 VwVfG due to essential change of circumstances: The dispute concerns the validity of the unwind of a fully performed public-law contract in light of a subsequent essential change in circumstances, challenging whether such an adjustment is permissible. The decisive legal issue centers on the applicability and prerequisites of Section 60 (1) of the Administrative Procedure Act (VwVfG) regarding contract adaptation versus retroactive unwinding, evaluated under Section 132 (2) No. 1 of the Administrative Court Rules (VwGO) for admission to revision.

Keywords

AI generated
administrative contract validity of contract matter in dispute revision proceedings rules of procedure rule of law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Ground for granting leave to appeal based on the fundamental significance of the legal question.
§ 52 Abs. 4 GKG
1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 4 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 4 GKG
Basis for the provisional determination of the disputed value for the revision proceedings.
AI generated
3 B 12/10, 3 B 12/10 (3 C 23/10)
Admission of revision on requirements for public-law contract altering sovereign authority transfer
9 B 83/11
Revision admission criteria: Binding effect of lower court's factual contract interpretation on the Federal Administrative Court
2 B 28/23, 2 B 28/23 (2 C 11/24)
Admissibility of revision for termination of civil service and scope of application of § 21 Sentence 2 AGVwGO BW
XI ZB 30/18
Admissibility of legal appeal against rejection of appeal for insufficient substantiation in loan contract unwinding dispute
9 B 72/09
Interpretation of public-law utility agreement and failure to substantiate procedural defect and divergence grounds for admission of revision

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Ground for granting leave to appeal based on the fundamental significance of the legal question.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 4 GKG

Basis for the provisional determination of the disputed value for the revision proceedings.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revisionszulassung; Rückabwicklung eines öffentlich-rechtlichen Vertrages

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde hat Erfolg. Der Rechtssache kommt die von der Beklagten geltend gemachte grundsätzliche Bedeutung nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zu. Im Revisionsverfahren wird voraussichtlich zu klären sein, ob und gegebenenfalls unter welchen Voraussetzungen § 60 Abs. 1 VwVfG die eine Rückabwicklung rechtfertigende Anpassung eines bereits vollständig erfüllten öffentlich-rechtlichen Vertrages aufgrund einer nachträglich eintretenden wesentlichen Änderung der Verhältnisse zulässt.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 4 GKG.