Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
5 B 36/11, 5 B 36/11 (5 C 25/11) AI generated

Cost reimbursement between public youth welfare agencies and the applicable scope of § 89a Abs. 3 SGB VIII

Case Number 5 B 36/11, 5 B 36/11 (5 C 25/11)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) dismissed the applicant’s complaint for leave to appeal (Nichtzulagebeschwerde) but admitted the subsequent appeal (Revision) due to the fundamental significance of the legal question, effectively advancing the case to the next stage of review. The dispute concerns the scope of application of cost reimbursement regulations between public youth welfare agencies under German social law. The decisive legal basis is § 89a Abs. 3 SGB VIII (Eighth Book of the Social Code), regarding the reimbursement of costs between public youth welfare providers, which the court determined requires clarification at the appellate level.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 89a Abs. 3 SGB VIII; Cost reimbursement between public youth welfare agencies and the applicable scope of § 89a Abs. 3 SGB VIII: Die Revision gegen das Urteil des Verwaltungsgerichtshofs Baden-Württemberg vom 16. Februar 2011 ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen. Die Revision kann dem Senat Gelegenheit geben, den Anwendungsbereich der Kostenerstattungsregelung des § 89a Abs. 3 SGB VIII zu klären.

Keywords

AI generated
reimbursement of costs scope of applicable law application for revision social assistance administrative complaint leave for youth work

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Februar 2011 ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen.
§ 89a Abs. 3 SGB VIII
Die Revision kann dem Senat Gelegenheit geben, den Anwendungsbereich der Kostenerstattungsregelung des § 89a Abs. 3 SGB VIII zu klären.
AI generated
5 C 3/16
Reimbursement of integration assistance costs between local youth welfare authorities: inapplicability of § 14 SGB IX priority rule and limits of the interest-protection principle under § 89c SGB VIII
5 C 25/11
Reimbursement Rights for Foster Care Providers After Change of Parental Residence: Scope of SGB VIII §§ 89a(3) and 89e(1)
5 B 52/09
SGB VIII reimbursement claims: admissibility requirements for demonstrating fundamental legal significance in appeals against cost-allocation and jurisdictional determinations
5 C 14/09
Reimbursement of Youth Welfare Costs: Scope of Exclusion Period Under § 111 SGB X for Continuous Care Across Changing Legal Bases
5 B 33/12, 5 B 33/12 (5 C 25/12)
Local jurisdiction for youth welfare services: scope of corresponding application of § 86 Abs. 4 SGB VIII under § 86 Abs. 5 Satz 3 SGB VIII

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kostenerstattung zwischen öffentlichen Jugendhilfeträgern

[GRUENDE]

Die Revision gegen das Urteil des Verwaltungsgerichtshofs Baden-Württemberg vom 16. Februar 2011 ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen. Die Revision kann dem Senat Gelegenheit geben, den Anwendungsbereich der Kostenerstattungsregelung des § 89a Abs. 3 SGB VIII zu klären.