Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
4 BN 23/11, 4 BN 23/11 (4 CN 6/11) AI generated

Urban Planning Justification for Strengthening Central Service Areas: Requirements for Land-Use Plan Determinations

Case Number 4 BN 23/11, 4 BN 23/11 (4 CN 6/11)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court granted permission for appeal in a dispute concerning the urban planning justification for statutory land-use plan determinations aimed at strengthening central service areas. The complainant prevailed on the procedural motion, as the court found the underlying question to be of fundamental importance requiring clarification, thereby reversing the lower instance's refusal to allow the appeal. The decisive legal basis is § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, which mandates appellate jurisdiction when a legal issue of general significance requires resolution by the highest administrative court, specifically regarding the substantive requirements for the urban planning justification of measures designed to enhance central service zones.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 GKG; Urban Planning Justification for Strengthening Central Service Areas: Requirements for Land-Use Plan Determinations: The complainant prevailed on the procedural motion, as the court found the underlying question to be of fundamental importance requiring clarification, thereby reversing the lower instance's refusal to allow the appeal. The decisive legal basis is § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, which mandates appellate jurisdiction when a legal issue of general significance requires resolution by the highest administrative court, specifically regarding the substantive requirements for the urban planning justification of measures designed to enhance central service zones.

Keywords

AI generated
urban planning urban area determination of jurisdiction substantive requirements land use regulation statutory basis

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen, weil das Revisionsverfahren zur Klärung der Frage beitragen kann, welche Anforderungen an die städtebauliche Rechtfertigung bauleitplanerischer Festsetzungen zur Stärkung von zentralen Versorgungsbereichen zu stellen sind.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs.
§ 63 Abs. 1 GKG
Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Basis for the determination of the amount in dispute for the complaint proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 GKG
Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
AI generated
4 B 8/11, 4 B 8/11 (4 C 13/11)
Requirements for Urban Planning Justification of Land-Use Plan Determinations to Strengthen Central Supply Areas
4 BN 24/11, 4 BN 24/11 (4 CN 7/11)
Urban planning justification standards for strengthening central supply areas
8 B 41/09
Validity of regional land-use plans under German spatial planning law and constitutional limits on transferring municipal planning competence to regional associations
4 BN 34/21, 4 BN 34/21 (4 CN 2/22)
Normenkontrolle against spatial planning plans: admissibility of challenging inner-area usage objectives by landowners
4 B 5.25, 4 B 5.25 (4 C 2.26)
Relationship between spatial planning and sector-specific law in approving deviations for urban development measures

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Basis for the determination of the amount in dispute for the complaint proceedings.

§ 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 GKG

Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revisionszulassung; städtebauliche Rechtfertigung bauleitplanerischer Festsetzungen zur Stärkung von zentralen Versorgungsbereichen

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde ist begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen, weil das Revisionsverfahren zur Klärung der Frage beitragen kann, welche Anforderungen an die städtebauliche Rechtfertigung bauleitplanerischer Festsetzungen zur Stärkung von zentralen Versorgungsbereichen zu stellen sind.

Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.