Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
4 BN 24/11, 4 BN 24/11 (4 CN 7/11) AI generated

Urban planning justification standards for strengthening central supply areas

Case Number 4 BN 24/11, 4 BN 24/11 (4 CN 7/11)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted leave to appeal for the plaintiff, finding the higher regional court's refusal of leave to appeal unjustified. The dispute concerned a challenge to urban planning determinations aimed at strengthening central supply areas, specifically questioning the urban planning justification required for such instruments. The court determined that the case presented a fundamental question of law regarding the specific standards for urban planning justification in this context, thereby satisfying the requirements for admission of a revision appeal. The decision sets the procedural stage for the full merits review to be conducted by the revision court.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 GKG; Urban planning justification standards for strengthening central supply areas: The dispute concerned a challenge to urban planning determinations aimed at strengthening central supply areas, specifically questioning the urban planning justification required for such instruments. The court determined that the case presented a fundamental question of law regarding the specific standards for urban planning justification in this context, thereby satisfying the requirements for admission of a revision appeal. The decision sets the procedural stage for the full merits review to be conducted by the revision court.

Keywords

AI generated
urban planning grounds for revision challenge of administrative decisions urban area review on the merits procedural review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for the verdict, justifying the admission of the revision appeal due to the need to clarify a fundamental legal question.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs.
§ 63 Abs. 1 GKG
Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Procedural rule cited in the order for the determination of the amount in dispute for the appeal proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 GKG
Procedural rule cited in the order for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
AI generated
4 B 8/11, 4 B 8/11 (4 C 13/11)
Requirements for Urban Planning Justification of Land-Use Plan Determinations to Strengthen Central Supply Areas
4 BN 23/11, 4 BN 23/11 (4 CN 6/11)
Urban Planning Justification for Strengthening Central Service Areas: Requirements for Land-Use Plan Determinations
4 B 13/12
Spatial demarcation of central supply areas under § 34(3) BauGB based on factual circumstances versus regional planning objectives
4 BN 5/21, 4 BN 5/21 (4 CN 10/21)
Spatial planning protection of local retail supply in non-central towns under the impairment prohibition
4 CN 10/21
Unlawfulness of spatial planning goal prohibiting impairment of local supply without reference to central place system

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for the verdict, justifying the admission of the revision appeal due to the need to clarify a fundamental legal question.

§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Procedural rule cited in the order for the determination of the amount in dispute for the appeal proceedings.

§ 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 GKG

Procedural rule cited in the order for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revisionszulassung; Anforderungen an die städtebauliche Rechtfertigung bauleitplanerischer Festsetzungen zur Stärkung zentraler Versorgungsbereiche

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde ist begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen, weil das Revisionsverfahren zur Klärung der Frage beitragen kann, welche Anforderungen an die städtebauliche Rechtfertigung bauleitplanerischer Festsetzungen zur Stärkung von zentralen Versorgungsbereichen zu stellen sind.

Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.