Legislator Case Law & Legislation
7 B 29/11, 7 B 29/11 (7 C 29/11) AI generated

Admissibility of revision on whether AVV-Baulärm intervention values define the noise tolerance threshold for retail spaces under § 74 Abs. 2 Satz 2 VwVfG and § 22 Abs. 1 Satz 1 BImSchG

Case Number 7 B 29/11, 7 B 29/11 (7 C 29/11)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG 7th Senate) dismissed the plaintiff's complaint and granted the defendant's leave to appeal, finding the appeal admissible due to the fundamental legal significance of the case. This decision concerns a plan approval proceeding where the dispute centers on the admissibility of a construction project and specifically the protection against construction noise. The court ordered that the pending revision proceedings be used to clarify whether and under what conditions the intervention values set by the Construction Noise Ordinance (AVV-Baulärm) are suitable to determine the threshold of tolerability for external noise affecting the contact area of retail spaces. The decisive legal basis for this admissibility determination is § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, in conjunction with the substantive issues arising from § 74 Abs. 2 Satz 2 VwVfG and § 22 Abs. 1 Satz 1 BImSchG regarding the compatibility of the plan with noise protection standards.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Admissibility of revision on whether AVV-Baulärm intervention values define the noise tolerance threshold for retail spaces under § 74 Abs. 2 Satz 2 VwVfG and § 22 Abs. 1 Satz 1 BImSchG: This decision concerns a plan approval proceeding where the dispute centers on the admissibility of a construction project and specifically the protection against construction noise. The court ordered that the pending revision proceedings be used to clarify whether and under what conditions the intervention values set by the Construction Noise Ordinance (AVV-Baulärm) are suitable to determine the threshold of tolerability for external noise affecting the contact area of retail spaces. The decisive legal basis for this admissibility determination is § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, in conjunction with the substantive issues arising from § 74 Abs. 2 Satz 2 VwVfG and § 22 Abs. 1 Satz 1 BImSchG regarding the compatibility of the plan with noise protection standards.

Keywords

AI generated
revision proceedings noise level assessment legal protection modification of building permit administrative complaint zoning compliance

Cited Legislation

AI generated
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Basis for admitting the revision appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Planfeststellung; Schutz gegen Baulärm

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde der Beklagten ist begründet. Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen.

Das Revisionsverfahren kann Gelegenheit geben, die Frage zu klären, ob und gegebenenfalls unter welchen Voraussetzungen die Eingriffswerte der AVV-Baulärm im Rahmen eines Schutzanspruchs aus § 74 Abs. 2 Satz 2 VwVfG i.V.m. § 22 Abs. 1 Satz 1 BImSchG geeignet sind, die Zumutbarkeitsgrenze für Lärm im Außenkontaktbereich von Ladengeschäften zu bestimmen.