Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
5 B 30/11, 5 B 30/11 (5 C 21/11) AI generated

Reimbursement of self-procured integration assistance costs: prerequisites under § 36a(3), § 35a SGB VIII

Case Number 5 B 30/11, 5 B 30/11 (5 C 21/11)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court admitted the plaintiff's appeal on points of law, granting a revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue, thereby overturning the lower court's implicit denial of the appeal and allowing the matter to proceed to a full merits hearing. The dispute concerned whether a youth welfare agency is obligated to reimburse expenses incurred by a beneficiary for self-procured integration assistance services. The decisive legal question identified for clarification is the precise set of prerequisites under which a claim exists for the assumption of such costs pursuant to § 36a(3) and § 35a of the Eighth Book of the Social Code (SGB VIII), within the framework of integration assistance.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 35a SGB VIII; Reimbursement of self-procured integration assistance costs: prerequisites under § 36a(3), § 35a SGB VIII: The dispute concerned whether a youth welfare agency is obligated to reimburse expenses incurred by a beneficiary for self-procured integration assistance services. The decisive legal question identified for clarification is the precise set of prerequisites under which a claim exists for the assumption of such costs pursuant to § 36a(3) and § 35a of the Eighth Book of the Social Code (SGB VIII), within the framework of integration assistance.

Keywords

AI generated
reimbursement of social assistance administrative costs social integration assumption of costs integration measures mutual legal assistance

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Cited in the operative order as the legal basis for admitting the appeal on points of law due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.
§ 35a SGB VIII
3, § 35a SGB VIII besteht.
AI generated
5 C 35/12
Reimbursement of self-procured childcare costs under analogous application of § 36a Abs. 3 SGB VIII
5 C 21/11
Self-procured school integration aid: Reimbursement for partial need despite youth welfare office's rejection and priority of school authorities
5 C 3/16
Reimbursement of integration assistance costs between local youth welfare authorities: inapplicability of § 14 SGB IX priority rule and limits of the interest-protection principle under § 89c SGB VIII
5 B 9/17
Reimbursement for self-arranged childcare: Prerequisite failure of primary claim under § 24 Abs. 2 SGB VIII blocks analogous application of § 36a Abs. 3 SGB VIII
B 8 SO 18/18 R
Reimbursement of self-procured transport costs as a necessary component of binding integration assistance for therapeutic kindergarten attendance

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Cited in the operative order as the legal basis for admitting the appeal on points of law due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Eingliederungshilfe; Übernahme der Aufwendungen durch Jugendhilfeträger bei Selbstbeschaffung

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde des Klägers ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen.

Die Revision kann dem Senat Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Frage geben, unter welchen Voraussetzungen ein Anspruch auf Übernahme von Aufwendungen im Rahmen der Eingliederungshilfe nach § 36a Abs. 3, § 35a SGB VIII besteht.