Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
2 B 88/10, 2 B 88/10 (2 C 62/11) AI generated

Participation of equality officer in administrative disciplinary proceedings under § 19 Abs. 1 BGleiG

Case Number 2 B 88/10, 2 B 88/10 (2 C 62/11)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted leave to appeal to the defendant, thereby allowing the case to proceed to the Revisionsverhandlung stage. The dispute concerns the procedural requirements for the mandatory participation of an equality officer in an administrative disciplinary proceeding. The court determined that the issue possesses fundamental legal significance, necessitating a clarification of the specific preconditions under which an equality officer must be involved pursuant to § 19 Abs. 1 of the Federal Act on Equal Treatment (BGleiG) in disciplinary matters.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Participation of equality officer in administrative disciplinary proceedings under § 19 Abs. 1 BGleiG: Die Revision des Beklagten ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO und § 69 BDG zuzulassen. In dem Revisionsverfahren kann geklärt werden, unter welchen Voraussetzungen die Gleichstellungsbeauftragte in einem behördlichen Disziplinarverfahren nach § 19 Abs. 1 BGleiG zu beteiligen ist.

Keywords

AI generated
disciplinary proceedings equal treatment participation in proceedings procedural requirement administrative offence action by staff

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Die Revision des Beklagten ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO und § 69 BDG zuzulassen.
AI generated
5 PB 16/16
Exclusion of equality officers from staff council elections: insufficient substantiation of fundamental significance for leave to appeal
5 A 2/21
Limitation of Equalities Officer's standing to challenge objection rejections under § 34 Abs. 2 No. 1 BGleiG
5 C 14/22
Exclusion of equality officer from employee selection process due to personal interest and constitutional impartiality principles
6 C 3/09
Right of gender equality officer to active participation in leadership conferences shaping personnel and organizational decision-making processes under § 20 Abs. 1 Satz 3 BGleiG
2 A 3/20
Involvement of equality officer in individual service assessments and procedural validity of early disclosure

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Beteiligung der Gleichstellungsbeauftragten im Disziplinarverfahren

[GRUENDE]

Die Revision des Beklagten ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO und § 69 BDG zuzulassen. In dem Revisionsverfahren kann geklärt werden, unter welchen Voraussetzungen die Gleichstellungsbeauftragte in einem behördlichen Disziplinarverfahren nach § 19 Abs. 1 BGleiG zu beteiligen ist.