Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
9 B 22/11, 9 B 22/11 (9 C 13/11) AI generated

Land consolidation: statutory grounds for permitting revision on divergence from case law regarding interim orders

Case Number 9 B 22/11, 9 B 22/11 (9 C 13/11)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted the appellant's complaint and permitted a revision appeal, finding that the lower court's decision deviated from established case law regarding the requirements for temporary orders in land consolidation proceedings. The dispute concerned a challenge to a provisional directive issued during a land consolidation process, specifically addressing the legal standards for such interim measures under § 36(1) Sentence 1 of the Federal Land Consolidation Act (FlurbG). By allowing the revision on grounds of legal divergence, the court effectively reversed the lower instance's procedural ruling to ensure consistent application of the doctrine governing provisional administrative orders, while the temporary fee settlement was made pursuant to the Court Costs Act.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, 2 und 3, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Land consolidation: statutory grounds for permitting revision on divergence from case law regarding interim orders: The dispute concerned a challenge to a provisional directive issued during a land consolidation process, specifically addressing the legal standards for such interim measures under § 36(1) Sentence 1 of the Federal Land Consolidation Act (FlurbG). By allowing the revision on grounds of legal divergence, the court effectively reversed the lower instance's procedural ruling to ensure consistent application of the doctrine governing provisional administrative orders, while the temporary fee settlement was made pursuant to the Court Costs Act.

Keywords

AI generated
land consolidation grounds for revision procedural orders statutory grounds challenge of administrative decisions settlement of dispute

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO
Basis for permitting the revision appeal due to deviation from established case law.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
1, 2 und 3, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, 2 und 3, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Provisions governing the provisional determination of the value in dispute for the revision proceedings and associated court costs.
AI generated
9 B 26/17
Land consolidation: specific requirements for temporary orders and the limits of judicial fact-finding in staged administrative procedures
8 B 1/22
Land consolidation provisional order: denial of continuing declaratory interest where repetition of administrative act realized
9 B 21/18
Land consolidation area delimitation requirements and interplay between annulment and obligation claims under § 8 FlurbG
8 B 3/22
Land consolidation: Admissibility of non-admission of revision and validity of lay judge allocation in simultaneous hearing days
9 B 32/14
Provisional possession order in land consolidation: classification as continuous administrative act under § 36 FlurbG

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO

Basis for permitting the revision appeal due to deviation from established case law.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, 2 und 3, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Provisions governing the provisional determination of the value in dispute for the revision proceedings and associated court costs.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Flurbereinigung; vorläufige Anordnung

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde des Klägers ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO wegen Abweichung des angefochtenen Urteils von der ständigen Rechtsprechung des Bundesverwaltungsgerichts zu den Voraussetzungen einer vorläufigen Anordnung nach § 36 Abs. 1 Satz 1 FlurbG zuzulassen.

Die vorläufige Festsetzung des Streitwerts für das Revisionsverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, 2 und 3, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.