Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
6 B 17/11, 6 B 17/11 (6 C 30/11) AI generated

Future scope of weapons and ammunition prohibition under § 41 Abs. 2 WaffG

Case Number 6 B 17/11, 6 B 17/11 (6 C 30/11)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court granted leave to appeal on the ground of fundamental legal significance, allowing the appellant to challenge the lower instance's decision and setting the amount in dispute for the subsequent appeal. The case concerns the scope of a future weapons and ammunition prohibition order under German law, specifically challenging whether such a ban can be imposed to cover prospective possession. The decisive legal basis is § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 of the Administrative Procedure Act (VwGO), which permits appeal when a question of law has not been sufficiently clarified in case law, identified here as whether a prohibition under § 41 Abs. 2 of the Weapons Act (WaffG) can be issued for future possession.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 2 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Future scope of weapons and ammunition prohibition under § 41 Abs. 2 WaffG: The case concerns the scope of a future weapons and ammunition prohibition order under German law, specifically challenging whether such a ban can be imposed to cover prospective possession. The decisive legal basis is § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 of the Administrative Procedure Act (VwGO), which permits appeal when a question of law has not been sufficiently clarified in case law, identified here as whether a prohibition under § 41 Abs. 2 of the Weapons Act (WaffG) can be issued for future possession.

Keywords

AI generated
weapons act challenge of administrative decisions scope of applicable law grounds of challenge prohibition of abuse of rights defence and military matters

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Primary legal basis cited in the first dispositive order to grant leave to appeal based on the fundamental significance of the legal question.
§ 52 Abs. 2 GKG
§ 52 Abs. 2 GKG; die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 2 und Abs. 3 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 2 GKG; die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 3 i.V.m. § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
AI generated
6 C 30/11
Whether a weapon possession ban under § 41 Abs. 2 WaffG requires current possession or may prohibit future acquisition of license-requiring firearms based on personal danger.
5 StR 555/18
Illegal firearm possession: Exclusion of liability for violating a weapons ban under § 52 Abs. 3 Nr. 8 WaffG for non-entitled individuals
3 StR 18/26
Incomplete characterization of concurrent firearms offenses in the dispositive and mandatory correction of the judgment
6 C 60/14
Hunter's possession of semi-automatic rifle with magazine capacity exceeding two rounds: interpretation of the ban on jagdgesetzlich prohibited weapons under WaffG and BJagdG
4 StR 33/23
Reclassification of unauthorized firearm possession under § 51 vs. § 52 WaffG and war weapon control under KrWaffKontrG

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Primary legal basis cited in the first dispositive order to grant leave to appeal based on the fundamental significance of the legal question.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revisionszulassung; zukünftiges Waffen- und Munitionsverbot

[GRUENDE]

Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen. Das Revisionsverfahren kann zur Beantwortung der bisher in der Rechtsprechung des Bundesverwaltungsgerichts nicht ausreichend geklärten Frage beitragen, ob ein Waffen- und Munitionsbesitzverbot nach § 41 Abs. 2 WaffG auch für den zukünftigen Besitz ausgesprochen werden kann.

Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 2 und Abs. 3 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 2 GKG; die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 3 i.V.m. § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.