Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
6 B 69/10, 6 B 69/10 (6 C 11/11) AI generated

Classification of military medical service as weaponless service in federal civil law

Case Number 6 B 69/10, 6 B 69/10 (6 C 11/11)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted leave to file an appeal on points of law, thereby allowing the plaintiff's procedural appeal to proceed and rejecting the lower court's implicit denial. This decision concerns a personnel dispute within the federal civil service (Bundesbeamte) challenging the classification of the military medical service as a "weaponless service," a classification that had adverse effects on the plaintiff's personnel status or benefits. The court determined that the legal question of whether the medical corps can still be classified as a weaponless service under the factual assumptions of the instance court is of fundamental importance, justifying review under § 10 Abs. 2 KDVG in conjunction with § 135 Satz 3 and § 132 Abs. 2 VwGO, which facilitates the clarification of this essential doctrinal issue by the Senate.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 52 Abs. 2 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 2 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 2, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Classification of military medical service as weaponless service in federal civil law: This decision concerns a personnel dispute within the federal civil service (Bundesbeamte) challenging the classification of the military medical service as a "weaponless service," a classification that had adverse effects on the plaintiff's personnel status or benefits. The court determined that the legal question of whether the medical corps can still be classified as a weaponless service under the factual assumptions of the instance court is of fundamental importance, justifying review under § 10 Abs. 2 KDVG in conjunction with § 135 Satz 3 and § 132 Abs. 2 VwGO, which facilitates the clarification of this essential doctrinal issue by the Senate.

Keywords

AI generated
leave for military service civil status medical file civil dispute procedural review administrative personnel

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 52 Abs. 2 GKG
§ 52 Abs. 2 GKG; die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
2, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 2 GKG
Basis for the determination of the amount in dispute (Streitwert) for the complaint proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 2, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
AI generated
6 C 11/11
Conscientious objector recognition for voluntary medical officers: overturning lack of legal protection interest
2 WDB 2/17
Wiedereinsetzung in den vorigen Stand nach krankheitsbedingtem Fernbleiben von der Berufungshauptverhandlung: Glaubhaftmachung der Teilnahmeabsicht und der Reise- sowie Verhandlungsunfähigkeit
1 WB 22/20
Unjusticiability of abstract internal directives and preparatory medical assessments under the Military Complaint Order
1 WB 15/17
Military service re-qualification to emergency care paramedic: discretionary limits on remaining service time and subsidiary nature of declaratory relief
1 WB 7/23
Health-based denial of military career advancement and scope of legal remedy instructions for mixed status and troop service decisions

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 10 Abs. 2 Satz 1 und 2 KDVG i.V.m. §§ 135 Satz 3, 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for granting leave to appeal on points of law due to the fundamental significance of the legal question regarding the classification of the medical service as a weaponless service.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 2 GKG

Basis for the determination of the amount in dispute (Streitwert) for the complaint proceedings.

§ 47 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 2, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revisionszulassung; Sanitätsdienst der Bundeswehr ein waffenloser Dienst?

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde des Klägers gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision ist begründet. Die Rechtssache hat grundsätzliche Bedeutung (§ 10 Abs. 2 Satz 1 und 2 KDVG i.V.m. §§ 135 Satz 3, 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO). Sie kann dem Senat Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Frage geben, ob unter den Voraussetzungen, die das Verwaltungsgericht als wahr unterstellt und auf die es seine Entscheidung gestützt hat, noch davon ausgegangen werden kann, dass der Sanitätsdienst in der Bundeswehr ein waffenloser Dienst ist.

Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 2 GKG; die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 2, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.