Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
3 B 71/10, 3 B 71/10 (3 C 8/11) AI generated

Jurisdiction of official supervisory organization to revoke mandate of appointed test engineer under vehicle licensing rules

Case Number 3 B 71/10, 3 B 71/10 (3 C 8/11)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court granted leave to appeal, allowing the plaintiff to proceed to revision on the grounds of fundamental significance, thereby overturning the lower court's rejection of the appeal complaint. The dispute concerns the vehicle licensing regime, specifically whether an officially recognized supervisory organization (AC) under Annex VIIIb of the German Road Traffic Licensing Regulation (StVZO) has the jurisdiction to revoke the mandate of a test engineer it itself appointed, or whether such a revocation requires the consent of the licensing and supervisory authority. The decision rests on § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, which permits revision when a legal question of fundamental significance requires clarification by the supreme administrative court.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 und 3 GKG, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; Jurisdiction of official supervisory organization to revoke mandate of appointed test engineer under vehicle licensing rules: The dispute concerns the vehicle licensing regime, specifically whether an officially recognized supervisory organization (AC) under Annex VIIIb of the German Road Traffic Licensing Regulation (StVZO) has the jurisdiction to revoke the mandate of a test engineer it itself appointed, or whether such a revocation requires the consent of the licensing and supervisory authority. The decision rests on § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, which permits revision when a legal question of fundamental significance requires clarification by the supreme administrative court.

Keywords

AI generated
supervisory jurisdiction administrative revocation of decision appointing authority provisional permit grounds for revision violation of jurisdiction rules

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for allowing the appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal question regarding the jurisdiction of the supervisory organization.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Procedural rule applied in determining the court fees and costs for the amount in dispute.
§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3 GKG
Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the proceedings on revision.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Procedural rule applied in calculating the provisional amount in dispute.
AI generated
3 B 52/16, 3 B 52/16 (3 C 19/17)
Legal effect of revoking licensing authority approval on subsequent supervisory organization’s withdrawal of inspection engineer appointment
3 C 19/17
Mandatory revocation of sovereign test engineer mandate for untrustworthiness despite prior warning
3 C 8/11
Revocation of inspection engineer appointment: agency competence and absence of state approval requirement under StVZO
3 AV 4/16
Jurisdiction for provisional public transport permits: exclusion of locally bound rights under § 52 No. 1 VwGO
3 B 16/14
Insufficient specification of medical fitness examination scope in driving license revocation proceedings

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for allowing the appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal question regarding the jurisdiction of the supervisory organization.

§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3 GKG

Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the proceedings on revision.

§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Procedural rule applied in calculating the provisional amount in dispute.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Procedural rule applied in determining the court fees and costs for the amount in dispute.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Zulassung von Fahrzeugen; Widerruf der Betrauung eines Prüfingenieurs; Zuständigkeit einer amtlich anerkannten Überwachungsorganisation; Revisionszulassung

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde hat Erfolg; die Sache hat grundsätzliche Bedeutung im Sinne von § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO. Das Revisionsverfahren kann dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht Gelegenheit geben, die Frage zu klären, ob eine amtlich anerkannte Überwachungsorganisation im Sinne der Anlage VIII b zu § 29 StVZO für den Widerruf der Betrauung eines von ihr betrauten Prüfingenieurs zuständig ist und ob sie hierfür gegebenenfalls der Zustimmung der Anerkennungs- und Aufsichtsbehörde bedarf.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.