Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
6 B 45/10, 6 B 45/10 (6 C 2/11) AI generated

Broadcasting Fee: Exemption of Non-Exclusively Private Reception Devices as Secondary Devices Under § 5 Abs. 3 RGebStV

Case Number 6 B 45/10, 6 B 45/10 (6 C 2/11)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court granted leave to appeal, thereby allowing the petitioner to proceed to the next instance and prevailing in this procedural stage. The case involves a dispute regarding the liability for broadcasting fees, specifically challenging whether novel broadcasting reception devices located in a non-exclusively private area but assigned to a property where the taxpayer maintains other private devices constitute exempt "secondary devices." The court found the matter to be of fundamental legal significance, as it requires clarification on the application of the secondary device exemption under § 5(3) of the Broadcasting Fee Statute (RGebStV) to such mixed-use premises, with the admission of revision based on § 132(2)(1) VwGO.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 3 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Broadcasting Fee: Exemption of Non-Exclusively Private Reception Devices as Secondary Devices Under § 5 Abs. 3 RGebStV: The case involves a dispute regarding the liability for broadcasting fees, specifically challenging whether novel broadcasting reception devices located in a non-exclusively private area but assigned to a property where the taxpayer maintains other private devices constitute exempt "secondary devices." The court found the matter to be of fundamental legal significance, as it requires clarification on the application of the secondary device exemption under § 5(3) of the Broadcasting Fee Statute (RGebStV) to such mixed-use premises, with the admission of revision based on § 132(2)(1) VwGO.

Keywords

AI generated
broadcasting fee right to install an antenna private property legal fees non-administrative dispute media law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Serves as the main ground for admitting the appeal on revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal dispute.
§ 52 Abs. 3 GKG
§ 52 Abs. 3 GKG; die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung beruht auf § 47 Abs.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 2 und Abs. 3 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 3 GKG; die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 3 GKG i.V.m. § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
AI generated
6 C 45/10
Exemption of internet-enabled computers from broadcasting fees as secondary devices under mixed private and commercial use on the same property
6 B 44/10
Fee exemption for secondary radio and television receivers in non-exclusive private areas
6 C 15/10
Exemption of internet-enabled PCs as secondary broadcasting devices: interpretation of § 5 Abs. 3 RGebStV requiring co-location on the same property rather than in the non-private area.
6 B 36/10, 6 B 36/10 (6 C 45/10)
Exemption of business-use internet-capable computer from broadcasting fee as a second device in shared domestic premises
6 C 7/09
Broadcasting fee exemption for mobile radio units in vehicles used exclusively for transport by facilities for disabled persons under § 5 Abs. 7 RGebStV

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Serves as the main ground for admitting the appeal on revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal dispute.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Nichtzulassungsbeschwerde; Rundfunkgebühr

[GRUENDE]

Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung des Rechtsstreits zuzulassen. Das angestrebte Revisionsverfahren kann zur Beantwortung der bisher in der Rechtsprechung des Bundesverwaltungsgerichts nicht ausreichend geklärten Frage beitragen, ob neuartige Rundfunkempfangsgeräte, die sich im nicht ausschließlich privaten Bereich befinden, aber einem Grundstück zugeordnet sind, auf dem der Gebührenpflichtige im privaten Bereich andere Rundfunkempfangsgeräte zum Empfang bereit hält, gemäß § 5 Abs. 3 RGebStV als Zweitgeräte von der Rundfunkgebühr befreit sind.

Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 2 und Abs. 3 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 3 GKG; die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 3 GKG i.V.m. § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.