Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
6 B 44/10 AI generated

Fee exemption for secondary radio and television receivers in non-exclusive private areas

Case Number 6 B 44/10
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court granted the applicant’s non-admission complaint and ordered the admission of revision to clarify a question of fundamental legal significance. The dispute concerned a radio and television fee assessment, specifically whether a novel receiving device located in a non-exclusive private area but assigned to a property where the fee payer maintains other private receiving devices constitutes a exempt secondary device under the Radio and Television Fee Statute. The court held that the matter required clarification under Section 132(2) No. 1 of the Code of Administrative Court Procedure because the existing case law had not sufficiently addressed the fee exemption status of such devices under Section 5(3) of the Radio and Television Fee Statute, thereby reversing the lower court’s refusal to allow the appeal.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 3 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 2 und Abs. 3 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 3 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 3 GKG i.V.m. § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Fee exemption for secondary radio and television receivers in non-exclusive private areas: The dispute concerned a radio and television fee assessment, specifically whether a novel receiving device located in a non-exclusive private area but assigned to a property where the fee payer maintains other private receiving devices constitutes a exempt secondary device under the Radio and Television Fee Statute. The court held that the matter required clarification under Section 132(2) No. 1 of the Code of Administrative Court Procedure because the existing case law had not sufficiently addressed the fee exemption status of such devices under Section 5(3) of the Radio and Television Fee Statute, thereby reversing the lower court’s refusal to allow the appeal.

Keywords

AI generated
non-administrative dispute administrative fee broadcasting fee private property right to install an antenna grounds for revision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for allowing the revision based on the fundamental significance of the legal dispute.
§ 52 Abs. 3 GKG
§ 52 Abs. 3 GKG; die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung beruht auf § 47 Abs.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 2 und Abs. 3 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 3 GKG; die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 3 GKG i.V.m. § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 2 und Abs. 3 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 3 GKG
Basis for the final determination of the amount in dispute for the complaint proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 3 GKG i.V.m. § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Basis for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute.
AI generated
6 B 45/10, 6 B 45/10 (6 C 2/11)
Broadcasting Fee: Exemption of Non-Exclusively Private Reception Devices as Secondary Devices Under § 5 Abs. 3 RGebStV
6 B 79/09
Exemption from broadcasting fees for secondary devices under state treaty law and the constitutional financing guarantee
6 B 36/10, 6 B 36/10 (6 C 45/10)
Exemption of business-use internet-capable computer from broadcasting fee as a second device in shared domestic premises
6 C 45/10
Exemption of internet-enabled computers from broadcasting fees as secondary devices under mixed private and commercial use on the same property
6 B 51/16
Residence-based broadcasting fees: admissibility of non-admission appeal and hearing rights in parallel proceedings

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for allowing the revision based on the fundamental significance of the legal dispute.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 2 und Abs. 3 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 3 GKG

Basis for the final determination of the amount in dispute for the complaint proceedings.

§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 3 GKG i.V.m. § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Basis for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Nichtzulassungsbeschwerde; Rundfunkgebühr

[GRUENDE]

Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung des Rechtsstreits zuzulassen. Das angestrebte Revisionsverfahren kann zur Beantwortung der bisher in der Rechtsprechung des Bundesverwaltungsgerichts nicht ausreichend geklärten Frage beitragen, ob neuartige Rundfunkempfangsgeräte, die sich im nicht ausschließlich privaten Bereich befinden, aber einem Grundstück zugeordnet sind, auf dem der Gebührenpflichtige im privaten Bereich andere Rundfunkempfangsgeräte zum Empfang bereit hält, gemäß § 5 Abs. 3 RGebStV als Zweitgeräte von der Rundfunkgebühr befreit sind.

Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 2 und Abs. 3 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 3 GKG; die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 3 GKG i.V.m. § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.