Legislator Case Law & Legislation
5 B 32/10, 5 B 32/10 (5 C 26/10) AI generated

Interpretation of statutory claims for compensation performance under the Compensation Performance Act

Case Number 5 B 32/10, 5 B 32/10 (5 C 26/10)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) dismissed the appeal, thereby upholding the lower court's ruling that was favorable to the plaintiffs, while simultaneously allowing the case to proceed to revision on the grounds of fundamental legal significance. The dispute concerned the interpretation of claims for compensation performance under compensation law, specifically challenging the legal status of the claimants' entitlements. The decisive legal basis for the decision is § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, which permits revision when a matter possesses fundamental importance, specifically to clarify the interpretation of § 1 Abs. 1 Satz 1 and Abs. 2 Satz 1 of the Compensation Performance Act (AusglLeistG).

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Interpretation of statutory claims for compensation performance under the Compensation Performance Act: Die Beschwerden der Klägerinnen sind zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen.

Keywords

AI generated
entitlement to compensation statutory grounds interpretation of the law matter in dispute legal status contract interpretation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Anspruch auf Ausgleichsleistung; Auslegung

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerden der Klägerinnen sind zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen.

Die Revision kann dem Senat Gelegenheit zur weiteren Klärung der Auslegung des § 1 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 2 Satz 1 AusglLeistG geben.