Constitutionally compliant application of § 60 Abs. 7 AufenthG deportation ban: standards for judicial fact-finding in cases of general dangers
Germany (DE)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Federal Administrative Court granted the complainant's appeal and permitted the appeal to the full court (Revision), thereby allowing the case to proceed for a final determination on the merits. The dispute concerned a challenge to a deportation ban under § 60 Abs. 7 AufenthG, specifically involving the doctrine of "allgemeine Gefahren" (general dangers) and its constitutionally compliant application in judicial fact-finding. The court ruled that the appeal must be admitted due to the fundamental legal significance of the matter, citing § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, to clarify the standards required for judicial conviction formation when applying deportation protection provisions in a manner consistent with the constitution.
Legislator headnote
AI generated§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Constitutionally compliant application of § 60 Abs. 7 AufenthG deportation ban: standards for judicial fact-finding in cases of general dangers: The dispute concerned a challenge to a deportation ban under § 60 Abs. 7 AufenthG, specifically involving the doctrine of "allgemeine Gefahren" (general dangers) and its constitutionally compliant application in judicial fact-finding. The court ruled that the appeal must be admitted due to the fundamental legal significance of the matter, citing § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, to clarify the standards required for judicial conviction formation when applying deportation protection provisions in a manner consistent with the constitution.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedLegal basis for admitting the revision (appeal to the full court) due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.
Full text
Abschiebungsverbot bei allgemeinen Gefahren; verfassungskonforme Anwendung; richterliche Überzeugungsbildung; Revisionszulassung
[GRUENDE]
Die Beschwerde ist zulässig und begründet.
Die Revision ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht Gelegenheit zur weiteren Klärung der Frage geben, welche Anforderungen an die richterliche Überzeugungsbildung in Fällen verfassungskonformer Anwendung von § 60 Abs. 7 Satz 1 und 3 AufenthG zu stellen sind.