Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
1 B 9/10, 1 B 9/10 (1 C 13/10) AI generated

Admission of revision for interpretation of "supporting terrorism" in Regelausweisung under § 54 Nr. 5 AufenthG and applicability of criminal law doctrine

Case Number 1 B 9/10, 1 B 9/10 (1 C 13/10)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) ordered the admission of the defendant's revision appeal, finding the appeal admissible and well-founded. The dispute concerned a regular expulsion order based on the defendant's membership in an organization that supports terrorism, with the key legal issue being the interpretation of the phrase "supports terrorism" within the context of expulsion grounds. The Court held that the case is of fundamental importance for the clarification of the legal concept under § 54 No. 5 of the Residence Act (AufenthG) and specifically whether the interpretation of this civil/administrative law concept may draw upon criminal law jurisprudence regarding §§ 129 and 129a of the Criminal Code (StGB).

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 54 Nr. 5 AufenthG; Admission of revision for interpretation of "supporting terrorism" in Regelausweisung under § 54 Nr. 5 AufenthG and applicability of criminal law doctrine: The dispute concerned a regular expulsion order based on the defendant's membership in an organization that supports terrorism, with the key legal issue being the interpretation of the phrase "supports terrorism" within the context of expulsion grounds. The Court held that the case is of fundamental importance for the clarification of the legal concept under § 54 No. 5 of the Residence Act (AufenthG) and specifically whether the interpretation of this civil/administrative law concept may draw upon criminal law jurisprudence regarding §§ 129 and 129a of the Criminal Code (StGB).

Keywords

AI generated
criminal revision criminal expulsion legal doctrine interpretation of the law terrorism revision of asylum decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Cited in the operative order as the basis for admitting the revision due to the fundamental importance of the legal issue.
§ 54 Nr. 5 AufenthG
Sie kann dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht Gelegenheit zur weiteren Klärung der Auslegung von § 54 Nr. 5 AufenthG geben, insbesondere zum Merkmal einer Vereinigung, die "den Terrorismus unterstützt", und inwieweit hierzu auf die strafrechtliche Rechtsprechung zu §§ 129, 129a StGB zurückgegriffen werden kann.
AI generated
1 B 58/16, 1 B 58/16 (1 C 18/16)
Admissibility of Revision: Interpreting Interplay Between §§ 26a and 27a AsylG
1 B 4/13
Befristung der Sperrwirkung einer Ausweisung: Voraussetzungen der Abweichung vom Ausreise-Erfordernis bei Asylberechtigten
1 B 70/17, 1 B 70/17, 1 PKH 41/17
Revisionszulassung in Asylsachen: Unzulässigkeit der Grundsatzrüge bei abweichender Tatsachenwürdigung ohne klärungsbedürftige Rechtsfrage
3 StR 189/24
Concurrence of laws for membership in a terrorist association: aggregation of acts into a single factual-legal unit and limits on re-prosecution of subsequent participation
1 B 19/11, 1 B 19/11, 1 PKH 11/11
Expulsion for supporting a terrorist association: scope of "support" under § 54 No. 5 AufenthG and interplay with freedom of expression

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Cited in the operative order as the basis for admitting the revision due to the fundamental importance of the legal issue.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Regelausweisung; Vereinigung, die den Terrorismus unterstützt; Revisionszulassung

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde des Beklagten ist zulässig und begründet.

Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht Gelegenheit zur weiteren Klärung der Auslegung von § 54 Nr. 5 AufenthG geben, insbesondere zum Merkmal einer Vereinigung, die "den Terrorismus unterstützt", und inwieweit hierzu auf die strafrechtliche Rechtsprechung zu §§ 129, 129a StGB zurückgegriffen werden kann.