Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
7 C 14/09 AI generated

Settlement-based discontinuance of proceedings under § 106 VwGO and voiding of prior judgments in a subsidy dispute

Case Number 7 C 14/09
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) ordered the discontinuance of proceedings because the parties reached a judicial settlement, simultaneously declaring the judgment of the Higher Administrative Court of Thuringia from November 26, 2008, and the judgment of the Administrative Court of Gera from July 17, 2006, void and of no effect. The dispute concerned a challenge to a financial subsidy granted to a foundation affiliated with a political party. Although the specific substantive legal merits were not decided due to the settlement, the procedural termination was effected under § 106 sentence 2 of the Administrative Procedure Act (VwGO), which allows for the resolution of litigation through a court-proposed settlement agreed upon by both parties, thereby nullifying the lower court rulings.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 106 Satz 2 VwGO; Settlement-based discontinuance of proceedings under § 106 VwGO and voiding of prior judgments in a subsidy dispute: The dispute concerned a challenge to a financial subsidy granted to a foundation affiliated with a political party. Although the specific substantive legal merits were not decided due to the settlement, the procedural termination was effected under § 106 sentence 2 of the Administrative Procedure Act (VwGO), which allows for the resolution of litigation through a court-proposed settlement agreed upon by both parties, thereby nullifying the lower court rulings.

Keywords

AI generated
settlement of dispute termination of proceedings proposed judgment subsidy procedural act administrative revocation of decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 106 Satz 2 VwGO
Procedural rule cited in the dispositive to justify the discontinuance of the proceedings due to the conclusion of a judicial settlement.
AI generated
7 C 13/09
Settlement of administrative subsidy dispute and nullification of prior judgments under VwGO § 106
9 B 18/24, 9 B 18/24 (9 B 67/07, 9 B 49/12)
Settlement of rehearing and appellate leave appeals; cost allocation for formally inadmissible BVerwG remedies under § 161 VwGO
1 C 15/22, 1 C 15/22 (1 C 10/19)
Withdrawal of revision and suspension of proceedings in administrative dispute
8 C 15/08
Withdrawal of administrative action pursuant to extrajudicial settlement and nullity of prior judgments
8 B 44/11, 8 B 44/11 (8 C 18/11)
Legitimate expectations of an administrative authority in subsidy revocation based on inter-authority administrative agreement

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 106 Satz 2 VwGO

Procedural rule cited in the dispositive to justify the discontinuance of the proceedings due to the conclusion of a judicial settlement.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Zuschuss an parteinahe Stiftung

[GRUENDE]

Mit Beschluss vom 16. Juni 2010 hat das Bundesverwaltungsgericht gemäß § 106 Satz 2 VwGO den Parteien den Abschluss eines Vergleichs vorgeschlagen. Der Beklagte hat dem Vergleichsvorschlag mit Schriftsatz vom 28. Juni 2010 zugestimmt. Der Kläger hat mit Schriftsatz vom 29. Juni 2010 dem vorgeschlagenen Vergleich ebenfalls zugestimmt. Damit ist das Verfahren durch Abschluss eines gerichtlichen Vergleichs beendet worden (vgl. § 106 Satz 2 VwGO). Es ist deshalb einzustellen. Die Urteile des Thüringer Oberverwaltungsgerichts vom 26. November 2008 und des Verwaltungsgerichts Gera vom 17. Juli 2006 sind für wirkungslos zu erklären.